» Articles » PMID: 17200301

Distinguishing Between Cooperative and Unimodal Downhill Protein Folding

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Jan 4
PMID 17200301
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional cooperative protein folding invokes discrete ensembles of native and denatured state structures in separate free-energy wells. Unimodal noncooperative ("downhill") folding, however, proposes an ensemble of states occupying a single free-energy well for proteins folding at >/=4 x 10(4) s(-1) at 298 K. It is difficult to falsify unimodal mechanisms for such fast folding proteins by standard equilibrium experiments because both cooperative and unimodal mechanisms can present the same time-averaged structural, spectroscopic, and thermodynamic properties when the time scale used for observation is longer than for equilibration. However, kinetics can provide the necessary evidence. Chevron plots with strongly sloping linear refolding arms are very difficult to explain by downhill folding and are a signature for cooperative folding via a transition state ensemble. The folding kinetics of the peripheral subunit binding domain POB and its mutants fit to strongly sloping chevrons at observed rate constants of >6 x 10(4) s(-1) in denaturant solution, extrapolating to 2 x 10(5) s(-1) in water. Protein A, which folds at 10(5) s(-1) at 298 K, also has a well-defined chevron. Single-molecule fluorescence energy transfer experiments on labeled Protein A in the presence of denaturant demonstrated directly bimodal distributions of native and denatured states.

Citing Articles

Circular oligomeric particles formed by Ros/MucR family members mediate DNA organization in α-proteobacteria.

Chaves-Sanjuan A, DAbrosca G, Russo V, van Erp B, Del Cont-Bernard A, Capelli R Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(22):13945-13963.

PMID: 39588759 PMC: 11662661. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1104.


The B domain of protein A retains residual structures in 6 M guanidinium chloride as revealed by hydrogen/deuterium-exchange NMR spectroscopy.

Yanaka S, Yagi-Utsumi M, Kato K, Kuwajima K Protein Sci. 2023; 32(3):e4569.

PMID: 36659853 PMC: 9926473. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4569.


Structural and dynamical determinants of a β-sheet-enriched intermediate involved in amyloid fibrillar assembly of human prion protein.

Russo L, Salzano G, Corvino A, Bistaffa E, Moda F, Celauro L Chem Sci. 2022; 13(35):10406-10427.

PMID: 36277622 PMC: 9473526. DOI: 10.1039/d2sc00345g.


Two-Dimensional Fluorescence Lifetime Correlation Spectroscopy: Concepts and Applications.

Otosu T, Yamaguchi S Molecules. 2018; 23(11).

PMID: 30441830 PMC: 6278346. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23112972.


Simultaneous Determination of Two Subdomain Folding Rates Using the "Transfer-Quench" Method.

Rahamim G, Amir D, Haas E Biophys J. 2017; 112(9):1786-1796.

PMID: 28494950 PMC: 5425376. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.01.037.


References
1.
Knott M, Chan H . Criteria for downhill protein folding: calorimetry, chevron plot, kinetic relaxation, and single-molecule radius of gyration in chain models with subdued degrees of cooperativity. Proteins. 2006; 65(2):373-91. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21066. View

2.
Naganathan A, Perez-Jimenez R, Sanchez-Ruiz J, Munoz V . Robustness of downhill folding: guidelines for the analysis of equilibrium folding experiments on small proteins. Biochemistry. 2005; 44(20):7435-49. DOI: 10.1021/bi050118y. View

3.
Matouschek A, Fersht A . Application of physical organic chemistry to engineered mutants of proteins: Hammond postulate behavior in the transition state of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(16):7814-8. PMC: 47233. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7814. View

4.
Kaya H, Liu Z, Chan H . Chevron behavior and isostable enthalpic barriers in protein folding: successes and limitations of simple Gō-like modeling. Biophys J. 2005; 89(1):520-35. PMC: 1366551. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.057471. View

5.
Ferguson N, Sharpe T, Schartau P, Sato S, Allen M, Johnson C . Ultra-fast barrier-limited folding in the peripheral subunit-binding domain family. J Mol Biol. 2005; 353(2):427-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.031. View