» Articles » PMID: 17197520

Children Unable to Perform Screening Tests in Vision in Preschoolers Study: Proportion with Ocular Conditions and Impact on Measures of Test Accuracy

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2007 Jan 2
PMID 17197520
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To examine the relative prevalence of ocular conditions among children who are unable to perform preschool vision screening tests and the impact on measures of screening test performance.

Methods: Trained nurse and lay screeners each administered a Lea Symbols visual acuity (VA) test (Good-Lite, Inc., Steamwood, IL), Stereo Smile II test (Stereo Optical, Inc., Chicago, IL), and Retinomax Autorefractor (Right Manufacturing, Virginia Beach, VA), and SureSight Vision Screener (Welch Allyn, Inc., Skaneateles Falls, NY) examinations to 1475 children who later received a comprehensive eye examination to identify amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, and unexplained reduced VA. The outcomes of the examination for children for whom screeners were unable to obtain results (Unables) were compared to the outcomes of children who passed and children who failed each screening test. When estimating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), Unables were classified as either screening failures or screening passers.

Results: Less than 2% of children were classified as Unables for each test. The percentage with an ocular condition was at least two times higher for Unables than for screening passers for six of the eight modes of screening (P < 0.05). Considering Unables as screening failures, rather than screening passers, increased the estimate of sensitivity by 1% to 3% (depending on test) and decreased the estimate of specificity by 0% to 2%; PPV decreased by 0% to 4% for most tests, whereas NPV increased by <1%.

Conclusions: Preschool children who are unable to perform VIP screening tests are more likely to have vision disorders than are children who pass the tests. Because < or =2% of children were unable to do each test, referring these children for an eye examination had little impact on the PPV and NPV of the tests, as administered in VIP.

Citing Articles

Pediatric and School-Age Vision Screening in the United States: Rationale, Components, and Future Directions.

Ambrosino C, Dai X, Antonio Aguirre B, Collins M Children (Basel). 2023; 10(3).

PMID: 36980048 PMC: 10047420. DOI: 10.3390/children10030490.


Pediatric Eye Evaluations Preferred Practice Pattern.

Hutchinson A, Morse C, Hercinovic A, Cruz O, Sprunger D, Repka M Ophthalmology. 2022; 130(3):P222-P270.

PMID: 36543602 PMC: 10680450. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.030.


Vision Screening, Vision Disorders, and Impacts of Hyperopia in Young Children: Outcomes of the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Studies.

Kulp M, Ciner E, Ying G, Candy T, Moore B, Orel-Bixler D Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2022; 11(1):52-58.

PMID: 35044337 PMC: 8813881. DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000483.


Feasibility of a school-based vision screening program to detect undiagnosed visual problems in kindergarten children in Ontario.

Nishimura M, Wong A, Dimaras H, Maurer D CMAJ. 2020; 192(29):E822-E831.

PMID: 32690557 PMC: 7828989. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.191085.


Positive predictive value and screening performance of GoCheck Kids in a primary care university clinic.

Law M, Pimentel M, Oldenburg C, de Alba Campomanes A J AAPOS. 2020; 24(1):17.e1-17.e5.

PMID: 31940501 PMC: 9982646. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.11.006.