» Articles » PMID: 17197215

Spatially Uniform Sampling in 4-D EPR Spectral-spatial Imaging

Overview
Journal J Magn Reson
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2007 Jan 2
PMID 17197215
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Four-dimensional EPR imaging involves a computationally intensive inversion of the sampled Radon transform. Conventionally, N-dimensional reconstructions have been carried out with N-1 stages of 2-D backprojection to exploit a dimension-dependent reduction in execution time. The huge data size of 4-D EPR imaging demands the use of a 3-stage reconstruction each consisting of 2-D backprojections. This gives three orders of magnitude reduction in computation relative to a single stage 4-D filtered backprojection. The multi-stage reconstruction, however, requires a uniform angular sampling that yields an inefficient distribution of gradient directions. We introduce a solution that involves acquisition of projections uniformly distributed in solid angle and reconstructs in three 2-D stages with the spatial uniform solid angle data set converted to uniform linear angular projections using 2-D interpolation. Images were taken from the two sampling schemes to compare the spatial resolution and the line width resolution. The degradation in the image quality due to the additional interpolation was small, and we achieved approximately 30% reduction in data acquisition time.

Citing Articles

Partial Acquisition of Spectral Projections Accelerates Four-dimensional Spectral-spatial EPR Imaging for Mouse Tumor Models: A Feasibility Study.

Oba M, Taguchi M, Kudo Y, Yamashita K, Yasui H, Matsumoto S Mol Imaging Biol. 2024; 26(3):459-472.

PMID: 38811467 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-024-01924-y.


Directional TV algorithm for fast EPR imaging.

Fang C, Xi Y, Epel B, Halpern H, Qiao Z J Magn Reson. 2024; 361:107652.

PMID: 38457937 PMC: 11091491. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2024.107652.


4D-image reconstruction directly from limited-angular-range data in continuous-wave electron paramagnetic resonance imaging.

Zhang Z, Epel B, Chen B, Xia D, Sidky E, Qiao Z J Magn Reson. 2023; 350:107432.

PMID: 37058955 PMC: 10197356. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2023.107432.


An iterative reconstruction algorithm without system matrix for EPR imaging.

Qiao Z, Lu Y, Liu P, Epel B, Halpern H J Magn Reson. 2022; 344:107307.

PMID: 36308904 PMC: 11575469. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107307.


A balanced total-variation-Chambolle-Pock algorithm for EPR imaging.

Qiao Z, Redler G, Epel B, Halpern H J Magn Reson. 2021; 328:107009.

PMID: 34058712 PMC: 11866404. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2021.107009.


References
1.
Halpern H, Chandramouli G, Barth E, Yu C, Peric M, Grdina D . Diminished aqueous microviscosity of tumors in murine models measured with in vivo radiofrequency electron paramagnetic resonance. Cancer Res. 1999; 59(22):5836-41. View

2.
Kuppusamy P, Li H, Ilangovan G, Cardounel A, Zweier J, Yamada K . Noninvasive imaging of tumor redox status and its modification by tissue glutathione levels. Cancer Res. 2002; 62(1):307-12. View

3.
Elas M, Williams B, Parasca A, Mailer C, Pelizzari C, Lewis M . Quantitative tumor oxymetric images from 4D electron paramagnetic resonance imaging (EPRI): methodology and comparison with blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 49(4):682-91. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10408. View

4.
Mailer C, Robinson B, Williams B, Halpern H . Spectral fitting: the extraction of crucial information from a spectrum and a spectral image. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 49(6):1175-80. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10474. View

5.
Berliner L, Fujii H, Wan X, Lukiewicz S . Feasibility study of imaging a living murine tumor by electron paramagnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med. 1987; 4(4):380-4. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910040410. View