» Articles » PMID: 17187280

The Effect of Graft Tensioning in Anatomic 2-bundle ACL Reconstruction on Knee Joint Kinematics

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2006 Dec 26
PMID 17187280
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, double bundle ACL reconstruction, in which the two bundles thought to have different effects on knee kinematics are reconstructed separately, is widely believed to more favorably restore normal knee kinematics than conventional single bundle ACL reconstruction. However, rotational kinematics during physiological movement after double bundle reconstruction has rarely been tested. The purpose of this study was to measure the kinematics of the ACL deficient and reconstructed knees using two different tensioning conditions in double bundle reconstruction, and to examine the effects of each graft on knee kinematics. Six cadaveric knees were used. Six degrees-of-freedom of knee kinematics and the tension of each graft were monitored during simulated knee extension with the ACL intact, resected, and reconstructed under two different tensioning conditions: 50 N on anteromedial bundle and 0 N on posterolateral bundle (AM-favored condition); 0 N on anteromedial bundle and 50 N on posterolateral bundle (PL-favored condition). Tibial translation: After ACL reconstruction, the tibia overcorrected posteriorly in both conditions. Such an overcorrection in the AM-favored condition was larger than in the PL-favored condition. Tibial rotation: The tibia was significantly externally rotated after ACL reconstruction at a low flexion angle in both conditions. However, at a high flexion angle, tibial external rotation was shown only in the AM-favored condition. Graft tension: While total tensions were similar between the two conditions, the AM bundle shared more tension in the AM-favored condition than in the PL-favored condition. A total of 50 N of tension force was assumed to be excessive for normalizing knee kinematics at a low flexion angle even if double bundle reconstruction was used. Additionally, the AM-favored tensioning reconstruction made the tibia rotate externally and translate posteriorly even at a high flexion angle. Further research is needed to normalize knee kinematics after ACL reconstruction, however it is recommended that a moderate tensioning force is applied to the PL bundle and a minimal tensioning force to the AM bundle in double bundle reconstruction to obtain better knee kinematics.

Citing Articles

Tibial graft fixation methods and bone tunnel enlargement: A comparison between the TensionLoc implant system and the double-spike plate.

Kimura M, Nakase J, Asai K, Yoshimizu R, Kanayama T, Tsuchiya H Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2022; 28:31-37.

PMID: 35465464 PMC: 9019697. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2022.03.003.


[Development of on-line lateral stiffness measurement system for anterior cruciate ligament and its influence on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Cui Z, Chen Z, Huang S, Yang H, Lei J, Zhu D Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2021; 38(1):145-153.

PMID: 33899439 PMC: 10307570. DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.202006060.


The Impact of ACL Laxity on a Bicondylar Robotic Knee and Implications in Human Joint Biomechanics.

Russell F, Kormushev P, Vaidyanathan R, Ellison P IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020; 67(10):2817-2827.

PMID: 32031928 PMC: 7116099. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2971855.


Stress distribution is deviated around the aperture of the femoral tunnel in the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nishizawa Y, Nakano N, Nagai K, Araki D Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 26(4):1145-1151.

PMID: 28401277 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4543-5.


Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols.

Kondo E, Yasuda K, Kitamura N, Onodera J, Yokota M, Yagi T BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17:65.

PMID: 26857109 PMC: 4746831. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0909-y.


References
1.
Hirokawa S, Solomonow M, Lu Y, Lou Z, DAmbrosia R . Anterior-posterior and rotational displacement of the tibia elicited by quadriceps contraction. Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20(3):299-306. DOI: 10.1177/036354659202000311. View

2.
Brandsson S, Karlsson J, Sward L, Kartus J, Eriksson B, Karrholm J . Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies. Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30(3):361-7. DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300031001. View

3.
Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H . Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20(10):1015-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.010. View

4.
Grood E, Suntay W . A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983; 105(2):136-44. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138397. View

5.
Bylski-Austrow D, Grood E, Hefzy M, Holden J, Butler D . Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension. J Orthop Res. 1990; 8(4):522-31. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100080408. View