» Articles » PMID: 1718699

Management of Acute Non-Q-wave Myocardial Infarction. The Role of Prophylactic Diltiazem Therapy and Indications for Predischarge Coronary Arteriography

Overview
Journal Drugs
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1991 Jan 1
PMID 1718699
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) differs from Q-wave MI in 3 important respects: a smaller infarct size, possibly due to early reperfusion resulting from spontaneous thrombolysis, relief of spasm, or both; more frequency patency of the infarct-related artery; and a larger residual mass of viable but jeopardized myocardium within the perfusion zone of the infarct-related vessel. Left ventricular function is generally better unless impaired by previous MI. After the acute phase, the prognosis is worse when residual ischaemia is present, and reinfarction rates during hospitalisation and in the subsequent year of follow-up are higher. As myocardial ischaemia is potentially reversible, its presence should be actively sought in all patients with recognised non-Q-wave MI. On the basis of current knowledge and available data, the following guidelines for the management of non-Q-wave MI patients can be recommended: (1) diltiazem and aspirin should be administered to all patients as soon as the diagnosis is established, unless contraindications exist; (2) patients who develop early recurrent ischaemia on therapy (i.e. angina with associated ST-T-wave changes) should undergo prompt cardiac catheterisation and myocardial revascularisation; and (3) patients with entirely uncomplicated hospital histories who are asymptomatic should undergo exercise stress testing, preferably in conjunction with 201Tl perfusion scintigraphy, before hospital discharge. Only those patients with evidence of significant residual ischaemia need cardiac catheterisation and myocardial revascularisation.

Citing Articles

Secondary prevention with calcium antagonists after acute myocardial infarction.

Hansen J Drugs. 1992; 44 Suppl 1:33-43.

PMID: 1283582 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199200441-00007.

References
1.
Branagan J, Walsh K, Kelly P, Collins W, McCafferty D, Walsh M . Effect of early treatment with nifedipine in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1986; 7(10):859-65. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061972. View

2.
Bussmann W, Seher W, Gruengras M . Reduction of creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB indexes of infarct size by intravenous verapamil. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 54(10):1224-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80071-5. View

3.
Bosch X, Theroux P, Waters D, Pelletier G, Roy D . Early postinfarction ischemia: clinical, angiographic, and prognostic significance. Circulation. 1987; 75(5):988-95. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.75.5.988. View

4.
. Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. First International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1986; 2(8498):57-66. View

5.
. Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II trial. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320(10):618-27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198903093201002. View