» Articles » PMID: 17186399

Exposure-measurement Error is Frequently Ignored when Interpreting Epidemiologic Study Results

Overview
Journal Eur J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2006 Dec 23
PMID 17186399
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: One important source of error in study results is error in measuring exposures. When interpreting study results, one should consider the impact that exposure-measurement error (EME) might have had on study results.

Methods: To assess how often this consideration is made and the form it takes, journal articles were randomly sampled from original articles appearing in the American Journal of Epidemiology and Epidemiology in 2001, and the International Journal of Epidemiology between December 2000 and October 2001.

Results: Twenty-two (39%) of the 57 articles surveyed mentioned nothing about EME. Of the 35 articles that mentioned something about EME, 16 articles described qualitatively the effect EME could have had on study results. Only one study quantified the impact of EME on study results; the investigators used a sensitivity analysis. Few authors discussed the measurement error in their study in any detail.

Conclusions: Overall, the potential impact of EME on error in epidemiologic study results appears to be ignored frequently in practice.

Citing Articles

Methods in causal inference. Part 3: measurement error and external validity threats.

Bulbulia J Evol Hum Sci. 2024; 6:e42.

PMID: 39600618 PMC: 11588564. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2024.33.


Exposure variables in veterinary epidemiology: are they telling us what we think they are?.

Ruple A, Sargeant J, OConnor A, Renter D Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1442308.

PMID: 39144077 PMC: 11323118. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1442308.


The potential impact fraction of population weight reduction scenarios on non-communicable diseases in Belgium: application of the g-computation approach.

Pelgrims I, Devleesschauwer B, Vandevijvere S, De Clercq E, Van der Heyden J, Vansteelandt S BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):87.

PMID: 38616261 PMC: 11016220. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02212-7.


Does adjustment for non-differential misclassification of dichotomous exposure induce positive bias if there is no true association?.

Burstyn I Glob Epidemiol. 2023; 7:100132.

PMID: 38152554 PMC: 10749869. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100132.


Leveraging External Validation Data: The Challenges of Transporting Measurement Error Parameters.

Ross R, Cole S, Edwards J, Zivich P, Westreich D, Daniels J Epidemiology. 2023; 35(2):196-207.

PMID: 38079241 PMC: 10841744. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001701.


References
1.
Kao W, Puddey I, Boland L, Watson R, Brancati F . Alcohol consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154(8):748-57. DOI: 10.1093/aje/154.8.748. View

2.
van Rossum C, Shipley M, Hemingway H, Grobbee D, Mackenbach J, Marmot M . Seasonal variation in cause-specific mortality: are there high-risk groups? 25-year follow-up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30(5):1109-16. DOI: 10.1093/ije/30.5.1109. View

3.
Ananth C, Smulian J, Demissie K, Vintzileos A, Knuppel R . Placental abruption among singleton and twin births in the United States: risk factor profiles. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153(8):771-8. DOI: 10.1093/aje/153.8.771. View

4.
Dosemeci M, Wacholder S, Lubin J . Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132(4):746-8. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115716. View

5.
Hebert L, Scherr P, McCann J, Beckett L, Evans D . Is the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease greater for women than for men?. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153(2):132-6. DOI: 10.1093/aje/153.2.132. View