Social Science and Bioethics: the Way Forward
Overview
Affiliations
It is no surprise that bioethics and sociology developed an adversarial relationship: bioethicists value the clear descriptions of ethically charged situations provided by social scientists, but doubt the ability of those trained in social science to logically derive and discern 'the good'. For their part, social scientists - experts in observing and collecting data about the way the world is- find bioethicists ignorant of the ways elegantly crafted solutions to ethical problems get altered when incarnated in varied social and cultural settings. This discipline-centred self-affirmation can be a satisfying exercise, but it offers nothing to the project of promoting more moral medicine and health care. The articles collected in this volume demonstrate the value of collaboration between social scientists and bioethicists. Focusing on four themes found in recent sociological research in bioethics - ethics of research, the creation of moral boundaries, bioethics and social policy, and the bioethical imagination - this anthology offers practical models of co-operative work where the strengths of each discipline are brought together to advance our understanding of bioethical issues and to show the way toward just and effective social policy.
Mihailov E, Provoost V, Wangmo T BMC Med Ethics. 2022; 23(1):140.
PMID: 36575520 PMC: 9794471. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00845-1.
Critical Realism and Empirical Bioethics: A Methodological Exposition.
McKeown A Health Care Anal. 2015; 25(3):191-211.
PMID: 25716752 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-015-0290-2.
Knight R, Small W, Pakula B, Thomson K, Shoveller J BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:54.
PMID: 24994501 PMC: 4086269. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-54.
Yoshizawa G, Ho C, Zhu W, Hu C, Syukriani Y, Lee I Genome Med. 2014; 6(5):39.
PMID: 24944586 PMC: 4062049. DOI: 10.1186/gm556.
Kingori P Soc Sci Med. 2013; 98:361-70.
PMID: 24210881 PMC: 3898703. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.013.