» Articles » PMID: 17179682

Mid-term Outcomes of Side-to-side Stapled Anastomosis in Cervical Esophagogastrostomy

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2006 Dec 21
PMID 17179682
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the mid-term results of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using a side-to-side stapled anastomosis method for treatment of patients with malignant esophageal disease. A total of 13 patients were reviewed retrospectively from January 2001 to November 2005 who underwent total esophagectomy through a right thoracotomy, gastric tube formation through a midline laparotomy and finally a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Average patient age was 62.6 yr old and the male to female ratio was 11:2. The mean anastomosis time was measured to be about 32.5 min; all patients were followed for about 22.8+/-9.9 months postoperatively. There were no early or late mortalities. There were no complications of anastomosis site leakage or conduit necrosis. A mild anastomotic stricture was noted in one patient, and required two endoscopic bougination procedures at postoperative 4th month. Construction of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis by side-to-side stapled anastomosis is relatively easy to apply and can be performed in a timely manner. Follow up outcomes are very good. We, therefore, suggest that the side-to-side stapled anastomosis could be used as a safe and effective option for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.

Citing Articles

Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.

Yuan Y, Zeng X, Zhao Y, Chen L World J Surg. 2017; 41(12):3164-3170.

PMID: 28721567 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4126-0.


[Management of delayed complications after esophagectomy].

Beham A, Dango S, Ghadimi B Chirurg. 2015; 86(11):1029-33.

PMID: 26400723 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-015-0086-9.


Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.

Xu Q, Wang K, Wang W, Zhang K, Chen L J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15(6):915-21.

PMID: 21484495 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1490-1.

References
1.
Gandhi S, Naunheim K . Complications of transhiatal esophagectomy. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1997; 7(3):601-10; discussion 611-2. View

2.
Patil P, Patel S, Mistry R, Deshpande R, Desai P . Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol. 1992; 49(3):163-7. DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930490307. View

3.
Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley R, Evans K, Inculet R, Nelems B . Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg. 1992; 163(5):484-9. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90393-6. View

4.
Lam T, Fok M, Cheng S, Wong J . Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992; 104(2):395-400. View

5.
Fok M, Law S, Stipa F, Cheng S, Wong J . A comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for oesophageal carcinoma. Endoscopy. 1993; 25(9):660-3. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1010427. View