» Articles » PMID: 17170044

Axonal and Somatic Filtering of Antidromically Evoked Cortical Excitation by Simulated Deep Brain Stimulation in Rat Brain

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2006 Dec 16
PMID 17170044
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antidromic cortical excitation has been implicated as a contributing mechanism for high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS). Here, we examined the reliability of antidromic responses of type 2 corticofugal fibres in rat over a stimulation frequency range compatible to the DBS used in humans. We activated antidromically individual layer V neurones by stimulating their two subcortical axonal branches. We found that antidromic cortical excitation is not as reliable as generally assumed. Whereas the fast conducting branches of a type 2 axon in the highly myelinated brainstem region follow high-frequency stimulation, the slower conducting fibres in the poorly myelinated thalamic region function as low-pass filters. These fibres fail to transmit consecutive antidromic spikes at the beginning of high-frequency stimulation, but are able to maintain a steady low-frequency (6-12 Hz) spike output during the stimulation. In addition, antidromic responses evoked from both branches are rarely present in cortical neurones with a more hyperpolarized membrane potential. Our data indicate that axon-mediated antidromic excitation in the cortex is strongly influenced by the myelo-architecture of the stimulation site and the excitability of individual cortical neurones.

Citing Articles

Presurgical structural imaging and clinical outcome in combined bed nucleus of the stria terminalis-nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Wang F, Dai L, Wang T, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhao Y Gen Psychiatr. 2024; 37(3):e101210.

PMID: 38912307 PMC: 11191758. DOI: 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101210.


Neural mechanisms of the temporal response of cortical neurons to intracortical microstimulation.

Kumaravelu K, Grill W Brain Stimul. 2024; 17(2):365-381.

PMID: 38492885 PMC: 11090107. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.012.


Microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex evokes task-dependent, spatially patterned responses in motor cortex.

Shelchkova N, Downey J, Greenspon C, Okorokova E, Sobinov A, Verbaarschot C Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7270.

PMID: 37949923 PMC: 10638421. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43140-2.


The Therapeutic Frequency Profile of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Rats Is Shaped by Antidromic Spike Failure.

Cassar I, Grill W J Neurosci. 2023; 43(27):5114-5127.

PMID: 37328290 PMC: 10324992. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1798-22.2023.


The cortical evoked potential corresponds with deep brain stimulation efficacy in rats.

Cassar I, Grill W J Neurophysiol. 2022; 127(5):1253-1268.

PMID: 35389751 PMC: 9054265. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00353.2021.


References
1.
Lozano A, Dostrovsky J, Chen R, Ashby P . Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: disrupting the disruption. Lancet Neurol. 2003; 1(4):225-31. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00101-1. View

2.
Guillery R, Sherman S . Thalamic relay functions and their role in corticocortical communication: generalizations from the visual system. Neuron. 2002; 33(2):163-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00582-7. View

3.
Gulledge A, Stuart G . Action potential initiation and propagation in layer 5 pyramidal neurons of the rat prefrontal cortex: absence of dopamine modulation. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(36):11363-72. PMC: 6740518. View

4.
Deschenes M, Landry P . Axonal branch diameter and spacing of nodes in the terminal arborization of identified thalamic and cortical neurons. Brain Res. 1980; 191(2):538-44. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91302-5. View

5.
Perlmutter J, Mink J, Bastian A, Zackowski K, Hershey T, Miyawaki E . Blood flow responses to deep brain stimulation of thalamus. Neurology. 2002; 58(9):1388-94. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.58.9.1388. View