» Articles » PMID: 17169588

Biomechanical Effects of Glenoid Retroversion in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Overview
Date 2006 Dec 16
PMID 17169588
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of glenoid retroversion after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral joint contact pressures, contact areas, and forces. We studied 8 cadaveric shoulders with a custom shoulder testing system that permits anatomic loading of the rotator cuff and the humerothoracic muscles. Each shoulder was tested intact and after total shoulder arthroplasty with the glenoid component in a neutral position and with the glenoid component retroverted 15 degrees . Glenohumeral contact pressures and areas were measured with Fuji pressure-sensitive film, and the glenohumeral forces were measured with a 6-df load cell. Glenohumeral contact areas decreased significantly, and contact pressures increased after total shoulder arthroplasty with both neutral glenoid components and retroverted glenoid components (P < .0002 to .04). Inferior forces decreased significantly after total shoulder arthroplasty with the retroverted glenoid components when compared with the intact, native shoulder (P < .02). Posterior forces also decreased significantly with the retroverted glenoid when compared with the neutral glenoid (P < .03). Placement of the glenoid in 15 degrees of retroversion significantly decreased glenohumeral contact area, increased contact pressure, and decreased inferior and posterior glenohumeral forces. Glenoid component retroversion may result in eccentric loading of the glenoid component and possibly lead to wear and loosening, signifying the importance of correct anatomic placement during total shoulder arthroplasty.

Citing Articles

Current trends in shoulder arthroplasty - Are the trends backed by evidence?.

Shields D, Sewpaul Y, Sandeep K, Atherton C, Goffin J, Rashid M J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 62:102897.

PMID: 39872122 PMC: 11762636. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102897.


A comparative analysis of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for posterior glenoid wear patterns.

Hardaway A, Renshaw A, Brolin T, Bernholt D, Azar F, Throckmorton T J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 61():102868.

PMID: 39816719 PMC: 11731588. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102868.


Assessment of Inter- and Intrasurgeon Variability in Preoperative Planning of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Evaluation.

Motta Filho G, Amaral M, Nascimento L, Godinho A, Checchia C, Raffaelli M Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024; 59(6):e950-e957.

PMID: 39711637 PMC: 11663061. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788783.


Evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver agreement of the reverse shoulder angle in the preoperative planning of reverse total shoulder arthroplasties.

Motta G, Amaral M, Cohen M, Schiefer M, da Fonseca R, Carolina Oliveira A Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241300686.

PMID: 39610691 PMC: 11600422. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241300686.


Mixed reality applications in upper extremity surgery: the future is now.

Calem D, Lubiatowski P, Trenhaile S, Gobbato B, Wong I, Alkhateeb J EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(11):1034-1046.

PMID: 39513697 PMC: 11619721. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0080.