The Influence of Surface Chemistry and Topography on the Contact Guidance of MG63 Osteoblast Cells

Overview

Journal J Mater Sci Mater Med

Publisher Springer

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2006 Dec 5

PMID 17143739

Citations 19

Authors

F S Magdon Ismail

R Rohanizadeh

S Atwa

R S Mason

A J Ruys

P J Martin

A Bendavid

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine in vitro the effects of different surface topographies and chemistries of commercially pure titanium (cpTi) and diamond-like carbon (DLC) surfaces on osteoblast growth and attachment. Microgrooves (widths of 2, 4, 8 and 10 microm and a depth of 1.5-2 microm) were patterned onto silicon (Si) substrates using microlithography and reactive ion etching. The Si substrates were subsequently vapor coated with either cpTi or DLC coatings. All surfaces were characterized using atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and contact angle measurements. Using the MG63 Osteoblast-Like cell line, we determined cell viability, adhesion, and morphology on different substrates over a 3 day culture period. The results showed cpTi surfaces to be significantly more hydrophilic than DLC for groove sizes larger than 2 microm. Cell contact guidance was observed for all grooved samples in comparison to the unpatterned controls. The cell viability tests indicated a significantly greater cell number for 8 and 10 microm grooves on cpTi surfaces compared to other groove sizes. The cell adhesion study showed that the smaller groove sizes, as well as the unpatterned control groups, displayed better cell adhesion to the substrate.

Citing Articles

Hierarchical Surface Pattern on Ni-Free Ti-Based Bulk Metallic Glass to Control Cell Interactions.

Cai F, Blanquer A, Costa M, Schweiger L, Sarac B, Greer A Small. 2023; 20(22):e2310364.

PMID: 38109153 PMC: 11475312. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202310364.

Three-dimensional-printed scaffolds for periodontal regeneration: A systematic review.

Figueiredo T, do Amaral G, Bezerra G, Nakao L, Villar C J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023; 27(5):451-460.

PMID: 37781321 PMC: 10538520. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_350_22.

Biological and Physico-Chemical Properties of Composite Layers Based on Magnesium-Doped Hydroxyapatite in Chitosan Matrix.

Iconaru S, Ciobanu C, Predoi G, Rokosz K, Chifiriuc M, Bleotu C Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(10).

PMID: 36295927 PMC: 9608974. DOI: 10.3390/mi13101574.

Argon Bioactivation of Implants Installed Simultaneously to Maxillary Sinus Lifting without Graft. An Experimental Study in Rabbits.

Omori Y, Botticelli D, Ferri M, Delgado-Ruiz R, Ferreira Balan V, Xavier S Dent J (Basel). 2021; 9(9).

PMID: 34562979 PMC: 8466067. DOI: 10.3390/dj9090105.

Nanotoxicity: a challenge for future medicine.

Akcan R, Aydogan H, Yildirim M, Tastekin B, Saglam N Turk J Med Sci. 2020; 50(4):1180-1196.

PMID: 32283898 PMC: 7379444. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1912-209.

References

Puleo D, Bizios R . Formation of focal contacts by osteoblasts cultured on orthopedic biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992; 26(3):291-301. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820260303. View

Bigerelle M, Anselme K, Noel B, Ruderman I, Hardouin P, Iost A . Improvement in the morphology of Ti-based surfaces: a new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response. Biomaterials. 2002; 23(7):1563-77. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00271-x. View

Howlett C, Evans M, Walsh W, Johnson G, Steele J . Mechanism of initial attachment of cells derived from human bone to commonly used prosthetic materials during cell culture. Biomaterials. 1994; 15(3):213-22. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90070-1. View

Matsuzaka K, Walboomers X, Yoshinari M, Inoue T, Jansen J . The attachment and growth behavior of osteoblast-like cells on microtextured surfaces. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(16):2711-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00085-1. View

Lenhert S, Meier M, Meyer U, Chi L, Wiesmann H . Osteoblast alignment, elongation and migration on grooved polystyrene surfaces patterned by Langmuir-Blodgett lithography. Biomaterials. 2004; 26(5):563-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.068. View

Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Ahossi V, Magnin G, Bernard J . Biological properties of acid etched titanium implants: effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 68(2):149-59. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.20003. View

Allen M, Law F, Rushton N . The effects of diamond-like carbon coatings on macrophages, fibroblasts and osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Clin Mater. 1993; 17(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/0267-6605(94)90041-8. View

van Kooten T, Schakenraad J, van der Mei H, Busscher H . Influence of substratum wettability on the strength of adhesion of human fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 1992; 13(13):897-904. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(92)90112-2. View

Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert T, Cochran D, Simpson J, Dean D . Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996; 32(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199609)32:1<55::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-O. View

10.

Eisenbarth E, Linez P, Biehl V, Velten D, Breme J, Hildebrand H . Cell orientation and cytoskeleton organisation on ground titanium surfaces. Biomol Eng. 2002; 19(2-6):233-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0344(02)00028-x. View

11.

Redey S, Razzouk S, Rey C, Bernache-Assollant D, Leroy G, Nardin M . Osteoclast adhesion and activity on synthetic hydroxyapatite, carbonated hydroxyapatite, and natural calcium carbonate: relationship to surface energies. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 45(2):140-7. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199905)45:2<140::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-i. View

12.

Bowers K, Keller J, Randolph B, Wick D, Michaels C . Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7(3):302-10. View

13.

Keller J, Stanford C, Wightman J, Draughn R, Zaharias R . Characterizations of titanium implant surfaces. III. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994; 28(8):939-46. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820280813. View

14.

Steinemann S . Titanium--the material of choice?. Periodontol 2000. 1999; 17:7-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00119.x. View

15.

Boyan B, Hummert T, Dean D, Schwartz Z . Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials. 1996; 17(2):137-46. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85758-9. View

16.

Ducheyne P, Willems G, Martens M, Helsen J . In vivo metal-ion release from porous titanium-fiber material. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984; 18(3):293-308. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820180306. View

17.

Wieland M, Chehroudi B, Textor M, Brunette D . Use of Ti-coated replicas to investigate the effects on fibroblast shape of surfaces with varying roughness and constant chemical composition. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 60(3):434-44. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10059. View

18.

Cochran D, Simpson J, Weber H, Buser D . Attachment and Growth of Periodontal Cells on Smooth and Rough Titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018; 9(3):289-297. View

19.

Clark P, Dunn G, Knibbs A, Peckham M . Alignment of myoblasts on ultrafine gratings inhibits fusion in vitro. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002; 34(7):816-25. DOI: 10.1016/s1357-2725(01)00180-7. View

20.

Anselme K . Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000; 21(7):667-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00242-2. View