» Articles » PMID: 17142105

Chronic Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis: Evaluation and Determinants of Survival During Long-term Follow-up

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2006 Dec 5
PMID 17142105
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: The natural history of chronic portomesenteric (PM) and portosplenomesenteric (PSM) venous thrombosis is defined poorly. Therapeutic options are limited, and are directed at the prevention of variceal bleeding and the control of abdominal pain related to gastrointestinal hyperemia.

Methods: Patients with extensive PM and PSM thrombosis were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate the efficacy of medical therapy and to determine which clinical variables had prognostic significance regarding long-term survival.

Results: Sixty patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 44 years (range, 18-68 y), were assessed. The median follow-up period was 3.5 years (range, 0.2-32.0 y). The overall survival rate was 73.3%, with 1- and 5-year survival rates of 81.6%, and 78.3%, respectively. One- and 5-year survival rates, excluding patients who died from malignancy-related causes, were 85.7% and 82.1%, respectively. Factors associated with improved survival included treatment with beta-blockers (P = .02; odds ratio [OR], .09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.70) and anticoagulation (P = .005; OR, 0.01; 95% CI, <0.01 to 0.26). Eighteen patients in total were anticoagulated, including 8 patients who had variceal bleeding, all of whom underwent endoscopic band ligation of esophageal varices before anticoagulation. By using Cox regression analysis, variables associated with reduced survival were the presence of ascites (P = .001; OR, 42.6; 95% CI, 5.03-360), and hyperbilirubinemia (P = .01; OR, 13.8; 95% CI, 1.9-100) at presentation. Six patients died of variceal hemorrhage.

Conclusions: Patients with chronic PM and PSM venous thrombosis without underlying malignancy have an acceptable long-term survival. Treatment with beta-blockers and anticoagulation appears to improve outcome.

Citing Articles

Safety and Efficacy of Portal Vein Recanalization with Creation of Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (PVR-TIPS) to Treat Chronic Portal Vein Thrombosis in Non-cirrhotic Patients.

Barbosa F, Aseni P, Vertemati M, Becchetti C, Airoldi A, De Gasperi A Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025; 48(3):351-361.

PMID: 39789254 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03923-6.


Current concepts in the management of non-cirrhotic non-malignant portal vein thrombosis.

Willington A, Tripathi D World J Hepatol. 2024; 16(5):751-765.

PMID: 38818283 PMC: 11135268. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i5.751.


Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Nonmalignant Noncirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis and Portosinusoidal Vascular Disorder.

Shalaby S, Miraglia R, Senzolo M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592220 PMC: 10931999. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051412.


Successful use of a mesocaval shunt to treat refractory ascites in a chronic pancreatitis induced portal vein thrombosis.

Dutta S, Pal B, Ram D, Shyamprasad S, Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah V Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022; 26(2):204-209.

PMID: 35193995 PMC: 9136419. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.21-146.


Portal and Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis.

Kodali S, Singal A Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2020; 16(4):142-145.

PMID: 33163165 PMC: 7609702. DOI: 10.1002/cld.938.