Measuring Health-related Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults: Swedish Normative Data for the SF-36 and the HADS, and the Influence of Age, Gender, and Method of Administration

Overview

Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2006 Dec 5

PMID 17140436

Citations 65

Authors

Anna Jorngarden

Lena Wettergen

Louise von Essen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of research about health-related quality of life (HRQL) among adolescents, as studies have to a large extent focused on adults. The main aim was to provide information for future studies in this growing field by presenting normative data for the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for Swedish adolescents and young adults. Additionally, the influence of age and gender, as well as method of administration, was investigated.

Methods: A sample of 585 persons aged 13-23 was randomly chosen from the general population, and stratified regarding age group (young adolescents: 13-15 years; older adolescents: 16-19 years, and young adults: 20-23 years) and gender (an equal amount of males and females). Within each stratum, the participants were randomized according to two modes of administration, telephone interview and postal questionnaire, and asked to complete the SF-36 and the HADS. Descriptive statistics are presented by survey mode, gender, and age group. A gender comparison was made by independent t-test; and one-way ANOVA was conducted to evaluate age differences.

Results: Effects of age and gender were found: males reported better health-related quality of life than females, and the young adolescents (13-15 years old) reported better HRQL than the two older age groups. The older participants (16-23 years old) reported higher scores when interviewed over the telephone than when they answered a postal questionnaire, a difference which was more marked among females. Interestingly, the 13-15-year-olds did not react to the mode of administration to the same extent.

Conclusion: The importance of taking age, gender, and method of administration into consideration, both when planning studies and when comparing results from different groups, studies, or over time, is stressed.

Citing Articles

Quality of life in chiropractic students pre- and post-COVID-19 lockdowns utilizing the Short-Form Health Survey-36.

Cade A, Niazi I, Whittaker E, Midanik R, Stevens K J Chiropr Educ. 2025; 39.

PMID: 39998914 PMC: 11866452. DOI: 10.7899/JCE-24-6.

Teenagers and Young Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Study Approach and Baseline Characteristics.

Lofkvist U, Dahlby-Skoog M, Persson A, Asp F, Verrecchia L, Gripenberg S Audiol Res. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39997160 PMC: 11851589. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15010016.

Development of updated population norms for the SF-36 for Hungary and comparison with 1997-1998 norms.

Bato A, Brodszky V, Rencz F Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025; 23(1):14.

PMID: 39962594 PMC: 11831779. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-025-02343-5.

Gender-specific changes in vision-related quality of life over time - results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study.

Hartmann A, Grabitz S, Wild P, Lackner K, Munzel T, Kerahrodi J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025; .

PMID: 39934353 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-025-06741-9.

Psychosocial impact of climatotherapy in young patients with psoriasis: a 3-month cohort study.

Nordgren M, Duvetorp A Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1458394.

PMID: 39534221 PMC: 11554493. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1458394.

References

Upton P, Eiser C, Cheung I, Hutchings H, Jenney M, Maddocks A . Measurement properties of the UK-English version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005; 3:22. PMC: 1079918. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-22. View

McHorney C . Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999; 20:309-35. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.309. View

Lubetkin E, Jia H, Franks P, Gold M . Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(10):2187-96. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-8028-5. View

Hampel P, Petermann F . Perceived stress, coping, and adjustment in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38(4):409-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.02.014. View

Robitail S, Simeoni M, Erhart M, Ravens-Sieberer U, Bruil J, Auquier P . Validation of the European proxy KIDSCREEN-52 pilot test health-related quality of life questionnaire: first results. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 39(4):596.e1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.01.009. View

Reinfjell T, Diseth T, Veenstra M, Vikan A . Measuring health-related quality of life in young adolescents: reliability and validity in the Norwegian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006; 4:61. PMC: 1584218. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-61. View

White D, Leach C, Sims R, Atkinson M, Cottrell D . Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with adolescents. Br J Psychiatry. 2000; 175:452-4. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.175.5.452. View

Eiser C, Morse R . Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess. 2001; 5(4):1-157. DOI: 10.3310/hta5040. View

Crawford J, Henry J, Crombie C, TAYLOR E . Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2002; 40(4):429-34. DOI: 10.1348/014466501163904. View

10.

Ware J, Kosinski M . Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response. Qual Life Res. 2002; 10(5):405-13; discussion 415-20. DOI: 10.1023/a:1012588218728. View

11.

Frost M, Bonomi A, Estwing Ferrans C, Wong G, Hays R . Patient, clinician, and population perspectives on determining the clinical significance of quality-of-life scores. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002; 77(5):488-94. View

12.

Vingilis E, Wade T, Seeley J . Predictors of adolescent self-rated health. Analysis of the National Population Health Survey. Can J Public Health. 2002; 93(3):193-7. PMC: 6979869. View

13.

Efficace F, Bottomley A, Osoba D, Gotay C, Flechtner H, Dhaese S . Beyond the development of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures: a checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials--does HRQOL evaluation in prostate cancer research inform clinical decision making?. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(18):3502-11. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.121. View

14.

Raty L, Larsson B, Soderfeldt B . Health-related quality of life in youth: a comparison between adolescents and young adults with uncomplicated epilepsy and healthy controls. J Adolesc Health. 2003; 33(4):252-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00101-0. View

15.

Meuleners L, Lee A . Adolescent quality of life: a school-based cohort study in Western Australia. Pediatr Int. 2003; 45(6):706-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2003.01798.x. View

16.

Huebner E, Valois R, Suldo S, Smith L, McKnight C, Seligson J . Perceived quality of life: a neglected component of adolescent health assessment and intervention. J Adolesc Health. 2004; 34(4):270-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.07.007. View

17.

Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M . Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version 2.0. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(1):251-6. DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015290.76254.a5. View

18.

Zigmond A, SNAITH R . The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67(6):361-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. View

19.

Stewart A, Greenfield S, Hays R, Wells K, Rogers W, Berry S . Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989; 262(7):907-13. View

20.

Ware Jr J, Sherbourne C . The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6):473-83. View