Article: Funding of North Carolina tobacco control programs through the Master Settlement Agreement

Changing political and economic forces in 1 tobacco-dependent state, North Carolina, demonstrate how the interplay between these forces and public health priorities has shaped current allocation of Master Settlement Agreement funds. Allocation patterns demonstrate lawmakers' changing priorities in response to changes in the economic climate; some of the agreement's funds targeted to tobacco farmers appear to reflect objectives favored by tobacco manufacturers. Funds earmarked for health have underfunded youth tobacco prevention and tobacco control initiatives, and spending for tobacco farmers in North Carolina has not lived up to the rhetoric that accompanied the original agreement. We discuss the implications of these findings for future partnerships between public health advocates and workers as well as tobacco control strategies.

Citing Articles

Poly-Tobacco Use among High School Students.

Kowitt S, Patel T, Ranney L, Huang L, Sutfin E, Goldstein A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(11):14477-89.

PMID: 26580636 PMC: 4661661. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121114477.

Communicating program outcomes to encourage policymaker support for evidence-based state tobacco control.

Schmidt A, Ranney L, Goldstein A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(12):12562-74.

PMID: 25485977 PMC: 4276631. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph111212562.

The Master Settlement Agreement and its impact on tobacco use 10 years later: lessons for physicians about health policy making.

Jones W, Silvestri G Chest. 2010; 137(3):692-700.

PMID: 20202950 PMC: 3021365. DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-0982.

Quit smoking advice from health professionals in Taiwan: the role of funding policy and smoker socioeconomic status.

Chang F, Hu T, Lo S, Yu P, Chao K, Hsiao M Tob Control. 2009; 19(1):44-9.

PMID: 19965797 PMC: 2921261. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2009.031435.

References

1.

Wakefield M, Chaloupka F . Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA. Tob Control. 2000; 9(2):177-86. PMC: 1748334. DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.2.177. View

2.

Austin W, Altman D . Rural economic development vs. tobacco control? Tensions underlying the use of tobacco settlement funds. J Public Health Policy. 2000; 21(2):129-56. View

3.

Levy D, Cummings K, Hyland A . A simulation of the effects of youth initiation policies on overall cigarette use. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90(8):1311-4. PMC: 1446318. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1311. View

4.

Bitton A, Fichtenberg C, Glantz S . msJAMA: reducing smoking prevalence to 10% in five years. JAMA. 2001; 286(21):2733-4. View

5.

Cutler D, Gruber J, Hartman R, Landrum M, Newhouse J, Rosenthal M . The economic impacts of the tobacco settlement. J Policy Anal Manage. 2002; 21(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1002/pam.1037. View

6.

Sloan F, Allsbrook J, Madre L, Masselink L, Mathews C . States' allocations of funds from the tobacco master settlement agreement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24(1):220-7. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.220. View

7.

Gross C, Soffer B, Bach P, Rajkumar R, Forman H . State expenditures for tobacco-control programs and the tobacco settlement. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(14):1080-6. PMC: 3535289. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa012743. View

8.

Pollack H, Jacobson P . Political economy of youth smoking regulation. Addiction. 2003; 98 Suppl 1:123-38. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.8.x. View

9.

Schroeder S . Tobacco control in the wake of the 1998 master settlement agreement. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(3):293-301. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsr031421. View

10.

Snyder A, Falba T, Busch S, Sindelar J . Are State legislatures responding to public opinion when allocating funds for tobacco control programs?. Health Promot Pract. 2004; 5(3 Suppl):35S-45S. DOI: 10.1177/1524839904264591. View

11.

Altman D, Zaccaro D, Levine D, Austin D, Woodell C, Bailey B . Predictors of crop diversification: a survey of tobacco farmers in North Carolina (USA). Tob Control. 1999; 7(4):376-82. PMC: 1751454. DOI: 10.1136/tc.7.4.376. View

12.

Siegel M . The effectiveness of state-level tobacco control interventions: a review of program implementation and behavioral outcomes. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002; 23:45-71. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.092601.095916. View

Funding of North Carolina Tobacco Control Programs Through the Master Settlement Agreement