A Controlled Trial of Web-based Feedback for Heavy Drinking College Students

Overview

Journal Prev Sci

Specialty Science

Date 2006 Dec 1

PMID 17136461

Citations 114

Authors

Scott T Walters

Amanda M Vader

T Robert Harris

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Alcohol consumption has been a growing concern at U.S. colleges, particularly among first-year students, who are at increased risk for problems. This study tested the efficacy of the "electronic Check-Up to Go" (e-CHUG), a commercially-available internet program, at reducing drinking among a group of at-risk college freshman.

Method: The design was a randomized controlled trial: 106 freshmen students who reported heavy episodic drinking were randomly assigned to receive feedback or to assessment only. Assessment measures were completed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks.

Results: At 8 weeks, the feedback group showed a significant decrease in drinks per week and peak BAC over control. By 16 weeks, the control group also declined to a point where there were no differences between groups. Changes in normative drinking estimates mediated the effect of the intervention. An additional 245 abstainers and light drinkers who were also randomized to condition did not show any intervention effect.

Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the efficacy of this intervention at reducing short-term drinking among at-risk students.

Citing Articles

Smartphone-Based Intervention Targeting Norms and Risk Perception Among University Students with Unhealthy Alcohol Use: Secondary Mediation Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Studer J, Cunningham J, Schmutz E, Gaume J, Adam A, Daeppen J J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e55541.

PMID: 39914807 PMC: 11843063. DOI: 10.2196/55541.

Integration of an Electronic Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Program Into an HIV Testing Program to Reduce Substance Use and HIV Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for Intervention Development and a....

Balan I, Marone R, Barreda V, Naar S, Wang Y JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e56683.

PMID: 38483463 PMC: 10979339. DOI: 10.2196/56683.

Preliminary Efficacy of a Web-Based Alcohol and Emotion Regulation Intervention on Intimate Partner Aggression Among College Women.

Stappenbeck C, Hammett J, Gulati N, Kaysen D Psychol Violence. 2024; 13(3):258-266.

PMID: 38463200 PMC: 10919120. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000458.

Does self-affirmation augment the effects of a mandated personalized feedback intervention? A randomized controlled trial with heavy drinking college students.

Carey K, DiBello A, Magill M, Mastroleo N Psychol Addict Behav. 2024; 38(8):836-849.

PMID: 38236233 PMC: 11255130. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000989.

Do brief motivational interventions increase motivation for change in drinking among college students? A two-step meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Tan Z, Tanner-Smith E, Walters S, Tan L, Huh D, Zhou Z Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023; 47(8):1433-1446.

PMID: 37526588 PMC: 10692312. DOI: 10.1111/acer.15126.

References

Walters S . In praise of feedback: an effective intervention for college students who are heavy drinkers. J Am Coll Health. 2000; 48(5):235-8. DOI: 10.1080/07448480009599310. View

Turrisi R, Wiersma K, Hughes K . Binge-drinking-related consequences in college students: role of drinking beliefs and mother-teen communications. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000; 14(4):342-55. DOI: 10.1037//0893-164x.14.4.342. View

Perkins H, Haines M, Rice R . Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse. J Stud Alcohol. 2005; 66(4):470-8. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.470. View

Miller E, Neal D, Roberts L, Baer J, Cressler S, Metrik J . Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?. Psychol Addict Behav. 2002; 16(1):56-63. View

Borsari B, Carey K . Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68(4):728-33. View

Neal D, Carey K . Developing discrepancy within self-regulation theory: use of personalized normative feedback and personal strivings with heavy-drinking college students. Addict Behav. 2004; 29(2):281-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.004. View

Marlatt G, Baer J, Kivlahan D, Dimeff L, Larimer M, Quigley L . Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998; 66(4):604-15. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.4.604. View

Neighbors C, Larimer M, Lewis M . Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72(3):434-47. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.434. View

OMalley P, Johnston L . Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among American college students. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002; (14):23-39. DOI: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.23. View

10.

Williams G, Aitken S, Malin H . Reliability of self-reported alcohol consumption in a general population survey. J Stud Alcohol. 1985; 46(3):223-7. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1985.46.223. View

11.

Wolber G, Carne W, Alexander R . The validity of self-reported abstinence and quality sobriety following chemical dependency treatment. Int J Addict. 1990; 25(5):495-513. DOI: 10.3109/10826089009053172. View

12.

Walters S, Neighbors C . Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom?. Addict Behav. 2005; 30(6):1168-82. PMC: 2459313. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.12.005. View

13.

Schuckit M, Klein J, Twitchell G, Springer L . Increases in alcohol-related problems for men on a college campus between 1980 and 1992. J Stud Alcohol. 1994; 55(6):739-42. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1994.55.739. View

14.

Del Boca F, Darkes J, Greenbaum P, Goldman M . Up close and personal: temporal variability in the drinking of individual college students during their first year. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72(2):155-64. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.155. View

15.

Agostinelli G, Brown J, Miller W . Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students. J Drug Educ. 1995; 25(1):31-40. DOI: 10.2190/XD56-D6WR-7195-EAL3. View

16.

Wechsler H, Lee J, Kuo M, Seibring M, Nelson T, Lee H . Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts. Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveys: 1993-2001. J Am Coll Health. 2002; 50(5):203-17. DOI: 10.1080/07448480209595713. View

17.

Baer J, Marlatt G, Kivlahan D, Fromme K, Larimer M, Williams E . An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992; 60(6):974-9. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.60.6.974. View

18.

Larimer M, Turner A, Anderson B, Fader J, Kilmer J, PALMER R . Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities. J Stud Alcohol. 2001; 62(3):370-80. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.370. View

19.

Lewis M, Neighbors C . Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: a review of the research on personalized normative feedback. J Am Coll Health. 2006; 54(4):213-8. PMC: 2459316. DOI: 10.3200/JACH.54.4.213-218. View

20.

Walters S, Bennett M, Miller J . Reducing alcohol use in college students: a controlled trial of two brief interventions. J Drug Educ. 2000; 30(3):361-72. DOI: 10.2190/JHML-0JPD-YE7L-14CT. View