» Articles » PMID: 17133399

Neural Characteristics of Successful and Less Successful Speech and Word Learning in Adults

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Nov 30
PMID 17133399
Citations 87
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A remarkable characteristic of the human nervous system is its ability to learn to integrate novel (foreign) complex sounds into words. However, the neural changes involved in how adults learn to integrate novel sounds into words and the associated individual differences are largely unknown. Unlike English, most languages of the world use pitch patterns to mark individual word meaning. We report a study assessing the neural correlates of learning to use these pitch patterns in words by English-speaking adults who had no previous exposure to such usage. Before and after training, subjects discriminated pitch patterns of the words they learned while blood oxygenation levels were measured using fMRI. Subjects who mastered the learning program showed increased activation in the left posterior superior temporal region after training, while subjects who plateaued at lower levels showed increased activation in the right superior temporal region and right inferior frontal gyrus, which are associated with nonlinguistic pitch processing, and prefrontal and medial frontal areas, which are associated with increased working memory and attentional efforts. Furthermore, we found brain activation differences even before training between the two subject groups, including the superior temporal region. These results demonstrate an association between range of neural changes and degrees of language learning, specifically implicating the physiologic contribution of the left dorsal auditory cortex in learning success.

Citing Articles

Lenition in L2 Spanish: The Impact of Study Abroad on Phonological Acquisition.

Wayland R, Meyer R, Vellozzi S, Tang K Brain Sci. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39335440 PMC: 11429641. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14090946.


Editorial: Second language learning and neuroplasticity: individual differences.

Yang J, Cao F, van Heuven W, Mei L Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1417238.

PMID: 38813565 PMC: 11133865. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417238.


Atypical brain lateralization for speech processing at the sublexical level in autistic children revealed by fNIRS.

Lai B, Yi A, Zhang F, Wang S, Xin J, Li S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2776.

PMID: 38307983 PMC: 10837203. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53128-7.


Cognitive Decline Associated with Aging.

Yang Y, Wang D, Hou W, Li H Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023; 1419:25-46.

PMID: 37418204 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-1627-6_3.


Examining Individual Differences in Language Learning: A Neurocognitive Model of Language Aptitude.

Turker S, Seither-Preisler A, Reiterer S Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 2(3):389-415.

PMID: 37213255 PMC: 10158630. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00042.


References
1.
Schneider P, Sluming V, Roberts N, Scherg M, Goebel R, Specht H . Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(9):1241-7. DOI: 10.1038/nn1530. View

2.
Hall D, Haggard M, Akeroyd M, Palmer A, Summerfield A, Elliott M . "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999; 7(3):213-23. PMC: 6873323. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)7:3<213::aid-hbm5>3.0.co;2-n. View

3.
Rauschecker J . Cortical processing of complex sounds. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998; 8(4):516-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80040-8. View

4.
Liebenthal E, Binder J, Spitzer S, Possing E, Medler D . Neural substrates of phonemic perception. Cereb Cortex. 2005; 15(10):1621-31. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi040. View

5.
Wong P, Parsons L, Martinez M, Diehl R . The role of the insular cortex in pitch pattern perception: the effect of linguistic contexts. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(41):9153-60. PMC: 6730056. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-04.2004. View