» Articles » PMID: 17126038

How Long to Scan? The Relationship Between FMRI Temporal Signal to Noise Ratio and Necessary Scan Duration

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2006 Nov 28
PMID 17126038
Citations 191
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent advances in MRI receiver and coil technologies have significantly improved image signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and thus temporal SNR (TSNR). These gains in SNR and TSNR have allowed the detection of fMRI signal changes at higher spatial resolution and therefore have increased the potential to localize small brain structures such as cortical layers and columns. The majority of current fMRI processing strategies employ multi-subject averaging and therefore require spatial smoothing and normalization, effectively negating these gains in spatial resolution higher than about 10 mm3. Reliable detection of activation in single subjects at high resolution is becoming a more common desire among fMRI researchers who are interested in comparing individuals rather than populations. Since TSNR decreases with voxel volume, detection of activation at higher resolutions requires longer scan durations. The relationship between TSNR, voxel volume and detectability is highly non-linear. In this study, the relationship between TSNR and the necessary fMRI scan duration required to obtain significant results at varying P values is determined both experimentally and theoretically. The results demonstrate that, with a TSNR of 50, detection of activation of above 2% requires at most 350 scan volumes (when steps are taken to remove the influence of physiological noise from the data). Importantly, these results also demonstrate that, for activation magnitude on the order of 1%, the scan duration required is more sensitive to the TSNR level than at 2%. This study showed that with voxel volumes of approximately 10 mm3 at 3 T, and a corresponding TSNR of approximately 50, the required number of time points that guarantees detection of signal changes of 1% is about 860, but if TSNR increases by only 20%, the time for detection decreases by more than 30%. More than just being an exercise in numbers, these results imply that imaging of columnar resolution (effect size=1% and assuming a TR of 1 s) at 3 T will require either 10 min for a TSNR of 60 or 40 min for a TSNR of 30. The implication is that at these resolutions, TSNR is likely to be critical for determining success or failure of an experiment.

Citing Articles

Multi-study fMRI outlooks on subcortical BOLD responses in the stop-signal paradigm.

Isherwood S, Kemp S, Miletic S, Stevenson N, Bazin P, Forstmann B Elife. 2025; 12.

PMID: 39841120 PMC: 11753779. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.88652.


Characterization and Mitigation of a Simultaneous Multi-Slice fMRI Artifact: Multiband Artifact Regression in Simultaneous Slices.

Tubiolo P, Williams J, Van Snellenberg J Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(16):e70066.

PMID: 39501896 PMC: 11538719. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70066.


Frequency-specific dual-attention based adversarial network for blood oxygen level-dependent time series prediction.

Zheng W, Bao C, Mu R, Wang J, Li T, Zhao Z Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(14):e70032.

PMID: 39329501 PMC: 11428273. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70032.


A practical guide for combining functional regions of interest and white matter bundles.

Meisler S, Kubota E, Grotheer M, Gabrieli J, Grill-Spector K Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1385847.

PMID: 39221005 PMC: 11363198. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1385847.


Brain clocks capture diversity and disparities in aging and dementia across geographically diverse populations.

Moguilner S, Baez S, Hernandez H, Migeot J, Legaz A, Gonzalez-Gomez R Nat Med. 2024; 30(12):3646-3657.

PMID: 39187698 PMC: 11645278. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03209-x.


References
1.
Lund T, Madsen K, Sidaros K, Luo W, Nichols T . Non-white noise in fMRI: does modelling have an impact?. Neuroimage. 2005; 29(1):54-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.005. View

2.
Murphy K, Garavan H . Deriving the optimal number of events for an event-related fMRI study based on the spatial extent of activation. Neuroimage. 2005; 27(4):771-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.007. View

3.
Kriegeskorte N, Goebel R, Bandettini P . Information-based functional brain mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(10):3863-8. PMC: 1383651. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0600244103. View

4.
Kim D, Duong T, Kim S . High-resolution mapping of iso-orientation columns by fMRI. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(2):164-9. DOI: 10.1038/72109. View

5.
Glover G, Li T, Ress D . Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn Reson Med. 2000; 44(1):162-7. DOI: 10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<162::aid-mrm23>3.0.co;2-e. View