» Articles » PMID: 17125928

Screening for Echinococcus Granulosus in Dogs: Comparison Between Arecoline Purgation, CoproELISA and CoproPCR with Necropsy in Pre-patent Infections

Overview
Journal Vet Parasitol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2006 Nov 28
PMID 17125928
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Echinococcus granulosus is an important zoonotic infection of dogs. The purpose of the present study assessed the performance of two laboratory diagnostic methods with arecoline purgation and necropsy in infected dogs. In total 65 dogs were successfully experimentally infected with protoscoleces of E. granulosus from ovine infection. At 14-34 days post-infection groups of dogs were purged with arecoline hydrobromide and then necropsied. Faecal samples were tested at weekly intervals by coproantigen ELISA and coproPCR. The necropsy infection rate with E. granulosus was 89.2 per cent. Only 43 per cent of dogs were successfully purged after one arecoline dose; this percentage increased to 76.9% for two doses of arecoline purgation. E. granulosus coproantigen was detected by coproELISA in 82.8% of faeces. The positive and negative predictive values for coproantigen ELISA were 96 and 44.4% respectively. E. granulosus DNA was detected in pre-patent faecal samples by coproPCR in 25.9% of dogs. These results indicate that coproELISA is more sensitive than arecoline purgation for the detection of pre-patent E. granulosus infection in dogs. CoproPCR detected E. granulosus DNA in dog faeces by 21 days post-infection before egg production.

Citing Articles

Development of a Copro-RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a assay to detect Echinococcus granulosus nucleic acids isolated from canine feces using NaOH-based DNA extraction method.

Shao G, Zhu X, Hua R, Chen Y, Yang G PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(12):e0012753.

PMID: 39666765 PMC: 11671004. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012753.


Immunodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis in livestock: Development and validation dataset of an ELISA test using a recombinant B8/2 subunit of .

Poggio T, Gomez J, Boado L, Vojnov A, Larrieu E, Mujica G Data Brief. 2022; 42:108255.

PMID: 35669005 PMC: 9163409. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108255.


Dispersal of taeniid eggs: Experimental faecal contamination of forest environment followed by DNA detection in wild berries.

Malkamaki S, Oksanen A, Nareaho A, Sukura A Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022; 27:e00152.

PMID: 35479263 PMC: 9035390. DOI: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2022.e00152.


Prevalence of in Owned Dogs in Lagos State, Nigeria.

Awosanya E, Ligali Z, Duedu K, Peruzzu A, Masala G, Bonelli P Vet Sci. 2021; 8(6).

PMID: 34198886 PMC: 8227389. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8060101.


New Insights Into the Peculiar World of the Shepherd-Dog Parasites: An Overview From Maremma (Tuscany, Italy).

Morandi B, Mazzone A, Gori F, Alvarez Rojas C, Galuppi R, Deplazes P Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7:564164.

PMID: 33088834 PMC: 7544896. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.564164.