» Articles » PMID: 17120942

The Surgical Infection Prevention and Surgical Care Improvement Projects: Promises and Pitfalls

Overview
Journal Am Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2006 Nov 24
PMID 17120942
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Variations in outcomes for patients who have surgery are well known, and there is extensive evidence that failure to apply standards of care known to prevent adverse events results in patient harm. Infections and postoperative sepsis, cardiovascular complications, respiratory complications, and thromboembolic complications represent some of the most common adverse events that occur after surgery. Patients who experience postoperative complications have increased hospital length of stay, readmission rates, and mortality rates; in addition, costs of care are increased for patients, hospitals, and payers. In 2002, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, implemented the Surgical Infection Prevention Project to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with postoperative surgical site infections. More recently, the Surgical Care Improvement Project, a national quality partnership of organizations committed to improving the safety of surgical care has been implemented. Although the Surgical Care Project does not focus on the complete set of important surgical quality issues, it does provide the incentive and infrastructure for national data collection and quality improvement activities for hospitals. There is now a strong national commitment to measure processes and outcomes of care for surgery in the United States.

Citing Articles

Antibacterial Envelope Use for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation Surgery: A Retrospective Review of 52 Cases.

Hagedorn J, Canzanello N, Bendel M, Pittelkow T, Lamer T J Pain Res. 2021; 14:2249-2254.

PMID: 34326664 PMC: 8315775. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S318886.


Using appropriateness criteria to identify opportunities to improve perioperative urinary catheter use.

De Roo A, Hendren S, Ameling J, Meddings J Am J Surg. 2020; 220(3):706-713.

PMID: 32008720 PMC: 7668235. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.008.


A Review of 2255 Emergency Abdominal Operations Performed over 17 years (1996-2013) in a Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit in India.

Parray A, Mwendwa P, Mehrotra S, Mangla V, Lalwani S, Mehta N Indian J Surg. 2018; 80(3):221-226.

PMID: 29973751 PMC: 6014947. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-016-1567-x.


Comparison of intravenous versus combined oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (COMBINE) for the prevention of surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled....

Vignaud M, Paugam-Burtz C, Garot M, Jaber S, Slim K, Panis Y BMJ Open. 2018; 8(4):e020254.

PMID: 29654027 PMC: 5898320. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020254.


Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infections as a risk factor for infection with Clostridium difficile.

Balch A, Wendelboe A, Vesely S, Bratzler D PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179117.

PMID: 28622340 PMC: 5473553. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179117.