» Articles » PMID: 17094958

Beyond Common Features: the Role of Roles in Determining Similarity

Overview
Journal Cogn Psychol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2006 Nov 11
PMID 17094958
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Historically, accounts of object representation and perceived similarity have focused on intrinsic features. Although more recent accounts have explored how objects, scenes, and situations containing common relational structures come to be perceived as similar, less is known about how the perceived similarity of parts or objects embedded within these relational systems is affected. The current studies test the hypothesis that objects situated in common relational systems come to be perceived as more similar. Similarity increases most for objects playing the same role within a relation (e.g., predator), but also increases for objects playing different roles within the same relation (e.g., the predator or prey role in the hunts relation) regardless of whether the objects participate in the same instance of the relation. This pattern of results can be captured by extending existing models that extract meaning from text corpora so that they are sensitive to the verb-specific thematic roles that objects fill. Alternative explanations based on analogical and inferential processes are also considered, as well as the implications of the current findings to research in language processing, decision making, and category learning.

Citing Articles

Novel objects with causal event schemas elicit selective responses in tool- and hand-selective lateral occipitotemporal cortex.

Leshinskaya A, Bajaj M, Thompson-Schill S Cereb Cortex. 2022; 33(9):5557-5573.

PMID: 36469589 PMC: 10152094. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac442.


How do we generalize?.

Taylor J, Cortese A, Barron H, Pan X, Sakagami M, Zeithamova D Neuron Behav Data Anal Theory. 2022; 1.

PMID: 36282996 PMC: 7613724. DOI: 10.51628/001c.27687.


Spatial Alignment Facilitates Visual Comparison in Children.

Zheng Y, Matlen B, Gentner D Cogn Sci. 2022; 46(8):e13182.

PMID: 35972902 PMC: 9540866. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13182.


The effects of testing the relationships among relational concepts.

Corral D, Healy A, Jones M Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022; 7(1):47.

PMID: 35639213 PMC: 9156590. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00398-2.


Exposure to co-occurrence regularities in language drives semantic integration of new words.

Savic O, Unger L, Sloutsky V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022; 48(7):1064-1081.

PMID: 35389699 PMC: 10243553. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001122.


References
1.
Nosofsky R, Palmeri T . An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychol Rev. 1997; 104(2):266-300. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.266. View

2.
Barr R, Caplan L . Category representations and their implications for category structure. Mem Cognit. 1987; 15(5):397-418. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197730. View

3.
Akhtar N, Tomasello M . Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. Dev Psychol. 1997; 33(6):952-65. DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.952. View

4.
Wisniewski E, Bassok M . What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cogn Psychol. 2000; 39(3-4):208-38. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0723. View

5.
Nosofsky R . Exemplar representation without generalization? Comment on Smith and Minda's (2000) "Thirty categorization results in search of a model". J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 26(6):1735-43. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1735. View