» Articles » PMID: 17088218

Intra- and Inter-item Associations Doubly Dissociate the Electrophysiological Correlates of Familiarity and Recollection

Overview
Journal Neuron
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Nov 8
PMID 17088218
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Single-process models of recognition memory posit that recognizing is based on a unidimensional value of global memory strength. By contrast, dual-process models propose the existence of two independent processes subserving the explicit recognition of previously encountered episodes, namely "familiarity" and "recollection." Familiarity represents a noncontextual form of recognition that may only support the retrieval of associative information when the to-be-associated information can be unitized, such as when two photographs depicting the same person are memorized (intra-item associations). Conversely, recollection enables retrieving associations between arbitrarily linked information, such as associations between photographs of different persons (inter-item associations). By measuring event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we obtained a double dissociation of familiarity and recollection that strongly favors dual-process accounts of recognition memory: the electrophysiological correlate of familiarity was significantly larger for intra- than for inter-item associations. Conversely, the electrophysiological correlate of recollection was significantly larger for inter- than for intra-item associations.

Citing Articles

EEG-based multivariate and univariate analyses reveal the mechanisms underlying the recognition-based production effect: evidence from mixed-list design.

Zhang B, Abdullah A, Yan M, Hou Y, Chen A, McLaren H Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 19:1507782.

PMID: 39996020 PMC: 11849048. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1507782.


Neural distinctiveness and reinstatement of hippocampal representations support unitization for associations.

Ricupero S, Carpenter C, Steinkrauss A, Gerver C, Chamberlain J, Monkman R Brain Res. 2022; 1798:148143.

PMID: 36328066 PMC: 10657642. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148143.


Effects of emotion and semantic relatedness on recognition memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Han M, Li B, Guo C, Tibon R Psychophysiology. 2022; 60(1):e14152.

PMID: 35867964 PMC: 10078278. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14152.


The Effects of Reward on Associative Memory Depend on Unitization Depths.

Yan C, Ding Q, Wu M, Zhu J Front Psychol. 2022; 13:839144.

PMID: 35237216 PMC: 8882644. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.839144.


Effects of emotional study context on immediate and delayed recognition memory: Evidence from event-related potentials.

Kuhn L, Bader R, Mecklinger A Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021; 22(1):57-74.

PMID: 34498230 PMC: 8791878. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00944-3.