» Articles » PMID: 1708718

Latency of Motor Evoked Potentials to Focal Transcranial Stimulation Varies As a Function of Scalp Positions Stimulated

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 1991 Apr 1
PMID 1708718
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEP) to transcranial magnetic stimulation from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), biceps brachii and deltoid muscles at rest and during slight voluntary activation. An 8-shaped coil connected to a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator was positioned over different scalp positions 1 cm apart. At least 24 stimuli were delivered at each location. Latencies of MEPs were compared with those obtained by electrical and magnetic stimulation during muscle activation. Progressively longer MEP latencies were obtained in 5 groups depending on the type and position of stimulation. The shortest latencies were obtained with (1) electrical stimulation during muscle contraction and (2) non-focal magnetic stimulation during muscle contraction; magnetic stimulation at rest produced longer latencies with stimulation of (3) an optimal position, (4) a suboptimal position, and (5) a non-optimal position. Mean latency differences between successive groups were 1.9, 2.0, 1.6, and 2.6 msec for APB. Similar latency differences were found for the other arm muscles. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that the different latencies evoked by stimulation at different scalp locations are determined by the summation at spinal motoneurons of excitatory postsynaptic potentials generated by successive numbers of I waves.

Citing Articles

Mapping the Cortical Representation of Paraspinal Muscles Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Optimized in People With Chronic Back Pain.

Saraiepour S, Kahrizi S, Ghabaee M, Bazrgari B Basic Clin Neurosci. 2024; 14(6):827-841.

PMID: 39070195 PMC: 11273208. DOI: 10.32598/bcn.2023.4419.1.


Motor evoked potential latency and duration from tibialis anterior in individuals with chronic stroke.

Cleland B, Sisel E, Madhavan S Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239(7):2251-2260.

PMID: 34059935 PMC: 8369391. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06144-2.


Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder.

Kearney-Ramos T, Haney M Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021; 109:110290.

PMID: 33677045 PMC: 9165758. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110290.


Stimulus Intensity Affects Variability of Motor Evoked Responses of the Non-Paretic, but Not Paretic Tibialis Anterior Muscle in Stroke.

Sivaramakrishnan A, Madhavan S Brain Sci. 2020; 10(5).

PMID: 32429115 PMC: 7287783. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10050297.


Increased Finger-Tapping Related Cerebellar Activation in Cervical Dystonia, Enhanced by Transcranial Stimulation: An Indicator of Compensation?.

Odorfer T, Homola G, Reich M, Volkmann J, Zeller D Front Neurol. 2019; 10:231.

PMID: 30930842 PMC: 6428698. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00231.