» Articles » PMID: 17074616

Evidence-based Scientific Data Documenting the Treatment and Cost-effectiveness of Comprehensive Pain Programs for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain

Overview
Journal J Pain
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2006 Nov 1
PMID 17074616
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Chronic pain is one of the most prevalent and costly problems in the United States today. Traditional medical treatments for it, though, have not been consistently efficacious or cost-effective. In contrast, more recent comprehensive pain programs (CPPs) have been shown to be both therapeutically efficacious and cost-effective. The present study reviews available evidence demonstrating the therapeutic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of CPPs, relative to conventional medical treatment. Searches of the chronic pain treatment literature during the past decade were conducted for this purpose, using MEDLINE and PSYCHLIT. Studies reporting treatment outcome results for patients with chronic pain were selected, and data on the major outcome variables of self-reported pain, function, healthcare utilization and cost, medication use, work factors, and insurance claims were evaluated. When available, conventional medical treatments were used as the benchmark against which CPPs were evaluated. This review clearly demonstrates that CPPs offer the most efficacious and cost-effective, evidence-based treatment for persons with chronic pain. Unfortunately, such programs are not being taken advantage of because of short-sighted cost-containment policies of third-party payers.

Perspective: A comprehensive review was conducted of all studies in the scientific literature reporting treatment outcomes for patients with chronic pain. This review clearly revealed that CPPs offer the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment for persons with chronic pain, relative to a host of widely used conventional medical treatment.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Among Adults With Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aaron R, Ravyts S, Carnahan N, Bhattiprolu K, Harte N, McCaulley C JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(3):e250268.

PMID: 40053352 PMC: 11889470. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0268.


Health care utilization patterns of patients enrolled in an interdisciplinary program for back pain.

Davin S, Lapin B, Udeh B, Rispinto S, Thompson N, Honomichl R N Am Spine Soc J. 2025; 21:100584.

PMID: 40026325 PMC: 11869842. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100584.


Descriptive study on oral health and pathologies in vulnerable migrant adolescents from North and West Africa.

Sirumal E, Parra-Rojas S, Cassol-Spanemberg J, Contreras-Madrid A, Perez-Jorge D, Velazquez-Cayon R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3429.

PMID: 39870761 PMC: 11772757. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87972-y.


Home-Use and Portable Biofeedback Lowers Anxiety and Pain in Chronic Pain Subjects.

Ly F, Santander T, Pavlov S, Zhao J, Zhang M, Arroyo D Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024; :15598276231221112.

PMID: 39554946 PMC: 11562280. DOI: 10.1177/15598276231221112.


Using Lean Six Sigma Methods to Develop an Efficient and Sustainable Interdisciplinary Team Program for Chronic Pain in a VA: PREVAIL Interdisciplinary Team Track.

Courtney R, Schadegg M, Hicks N, Truitt M, Bolton R, Dezzutti B Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024; 13:27536130241290798.

PMID: 39483953 PMC: 11526189. DOI: 10.1177/27536130241290798.