» Articles » PMID: 17074349

Interobserver and Intraobserver Variation in Day 3 Embryo Grading

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2006 Nov 1
PMID 17074349
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Variations in pregnancy rates (PR) between IVF programs are due to multiple factors, including embryo quality. Standardized embryo grading systems have been developed to improve communication between embryologists and clinicians. However, these grading systems have not been validated. We sought to quantify both interobserver and intraobserver variability using a standardized day 3 embryo grading system (Veeck scale).

Design: Prospective, sample-randomized, controlled, blinded study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patient(s): Twenty-six practicing embryologists.

Intervention(s): Observation and grading of 35 video clips of day 3 embryos.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Interobserver and intraobserver variability. Embryologists were also assessed by education level, years of experience, size of IVF program, and type of grading system used. Kappa scores and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated.

Result(s): Practicing embryologists differed from control (Lucinda Veeck) by as much as two grades, despite using the same grading system (Kappa = 0.24, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). There was also variability in grading the same embryo (Kappa = 0.69, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.88). Programs with higher cycle numbers per year had lower variability.

Conclusion(s): There is substantial interobserver variability and moderate intraobserver variability among embryologists. Such variability could alter both the expected quality of embryos transferred, as well as the number transferred, both of which directly impact IVF program success.

Citing Articles

Application of a methodological framework for the development and multicenter validation of reliable artificial intelligence in embryo evaluation.

Gilboa D, Garg A, Shapiro M, Meseguer M, Amar Y, Lustgarten N Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):16.

PMID: 39891250 PMC: 11783712. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01351-w.


The correlation between blastocyst morphological parameters and chromosomal euploidy, aneuploidy and other chromosomal abnormalities following pre-implantation genetic testing-a single center retrospective study.

Hochberg A, Amoura L, Zhang X, Zhang L, Dahan M, Ao A Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 39878851 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-025-07968-x.


A generalized AI system for human embryo selection covering the entire IVF cycle via multi-modal contrastive learning.

Wang G, Wang K, Gao Y, Chen L, Gao T, Ma Y Patterns (N Y). 2024; 5(7):100985.

PMID: 39081572 PMC: 11284500. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100985.


Artificial intelligence system for outcome evaluations of human in vitro fertilization-derived embryos.

Sun L, Li J, Zeng S, Luo Q, Miao H, Liang Y Chin Med J (Engl). 2024; 137(16):1939-1949.

PMID: 38997251 PMC: 11332789. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003162.


An artificial intelligence algorithm to select most viable embryos considering current process in IVF labs.

Borna M, Sepehri M, Maleki B Front Artif Intell. 2024; 7:1375474.

PMID: 38881952 PMC: 11177761. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1375474.