» Articles » PMID: 17072631

CO(2) Laser Treatment of Laryngeal Stenoses After Reconstructive Laryngectomies with Cricohyoidopexy, Cricohyoidoepiglottopexy or Tracheohyoidoepiglottopexy

Overview
Date 2006 Oct 31
PMID 17072631
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy (CHP) or cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP) is a conservative laryngeal surgery tailored to T1b-T2-T3 glottic-supraglottic carcinomas. Tracheohyoidopexy (THP) and tracheohyoidoepiglottopexy (THEP) allow a chance of conservative surgery also for selected transglottic carcinomas. These techniques are comprehensively named reconstructive laryngectomies (RLs). Post RL laryngeal stenosis not due to carcinoma persistence or recurrence is an unusual occurrence. The aim of the present study has been to analyse retrospectively and describe the treatment of the cases of laryngeal stenosis after RL, which occurred in Vittorio Veneto Otolaryngological Department in a 6 year period. In the period between 1999 and 2004, 225 patients underwent RL in our Department. In 18 of them (8%) a laryngeal stenosis after RL was diagnosed. The same evidence was shown in 2 patients who underwent RL in other Institutions. All patients underwent CO(2) laser surgical treatment of the laryngeal stenosis. The 14 patients who underwent RL-CHEP, the 5 patients who underwent THEP and the patient who underwent CHP were treated on average with CO(2) laser 1.2 (range 1-2), 4.2 (range 2-7), and 2 times, respectively. Decannulation was possible in all patients but one after CO(2) laser treatment of the stenosis in a mean period of 3.4 months. Laryngeal stenoses after RLs can be successfully treated with CO(2) laser excision with a very limited morbility. The only reasonable contra-indication to CO(2) laser excision could be a cranio-caudal length of the laryngeal stenotic tract longer than 1 cm: in this occurrence diagnosed after THP or THEP, an external surgical approach could be preferred.

Citing Articles

Flexible endoscopic phonosurgery for treatment of functional sequelae after laryngeal oncologic surgery: a narrative review.

Magnani M, Ricci Maccarini A, Morolli F, Fabbri C, Stacchini M Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024; 44(Suppl. 1):S12-S19.

PMID: 38745512 PMC: 11098542. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-44-2024-N2969.


Attempt to improve functional outcomes in supracricoid laryngectomy in T2b and T3 glottic cancers.

Leszczynska M, Wierzbicka M, Tokarski M, Szyfter W Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 272(10):2925-31.

PMID: 25142079 PMC: 4545186. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3244-7.


Respiratory complications after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.

Decotte A, Woisard V, Percodani J, Pessey J, Serrano E, Vergez S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 267(9):1415-21.

PMID: 20582550 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1238-7.

References
1.
Perepelitsyn I, Shapshay S . Endoscopic treatment of laryngeal and tracheal stenosis-has mitomycin C improved the outcome?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 131(1):16-20. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(04)01136-2. View

2.
Roh J, Yoon Y . Prevention of anterior glottic stenosis after transoral microresection of glottic lesions involving the anterior commissure with mitomycin C. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115(6):1055-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163341.67553.B9. View

3.
PIQUET J, Chevalier D . Subtotal laryngectomy with crico-hyoido-epiglotto-pexy for the treatment of extended glottic carcinomas. Am J Surg. 1991; 162(4):357-61. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90148-7. View

4.
Gallo A, Manciocco V, Simonelli M, Pagliuca G, DArcangelo E, de Vincentiis M . Supracricoid partial laryngectomy in the treatment of laryngeal cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 131(7):620-5. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.131.7.620. View

5.
Diaz Jr E, Laccourreye L, Veivers D, Garcia D, Brasnu D, Laccourreye O . Laryngeal stenosis after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000; 109(11):1077-81. DOI: 10.1177/000348940010901115. View