» Articles » PMID: 17066303

Seasonal Variation in Avian Auditory Evoked Responses to Tones: a Comparative Analysis of Carolina Chickadees, Tufted Titmice, and White-breasted Nuthatches

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2006 Oct 27
PMID 17066303
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We tested for seasonal plasticity of the peripheral auditory system of three North American members of the Sylvioidea: Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis). We measured three classes of auditory evoked responses (AER) to tone stimuli: sustained receptor/neural responses to pure-tone condensation waveforms, the frequency-following response (FFR), and the earliest peak of the AER to stimulus onset (tone onset response). Seasonal changes were detected in all classes of AERs in chickadees and nuthatches. Seasonal changes in titmice were restricted to the tone onset response. Interestingly, changes detected in chickadees (and to a lesser extent in titmice) were generally in an opposite direction to changes seen in nuthatches, with chickadees exhibiting greater amplitude AER responses in the spring than in winter, and nuthatches exhibiting greater amplitude AER responses in winter than in spring. In addition, the seasonal differences in the sustained responses tended to be broad-band in the chickadees but restricted to a narrower frequency range in nuthatches. In contrast, seasonal differences in the onset response were over a broader frequency range in titmice than in chickadees and nuthatches. We discuss some possible mechanistic and functional explanations for these seasonal changes.

Citing Articles

Auditory learning in an operant task with social reinforcement is dependent on neuroestrogen synthesis in the male songbird auditory cortex.

Macedo-Lima M, Remage-Healey L Horm Behav. 2020; 121:104713.

PMID: 32057821 PMC: 7198363. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104713.


Estradiol modulates neural response to conspecific and heterospecific song in female house sparrows: An in vivo positron emission tomography study.

Lattin C, Stabile F, Carson R PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0182875.

PMID: 28832614 PMC: 5568339. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182875.


Hearing conspecific vocal signals alters peripheral auditory sensitivity.

Gall M, Wilczynski W Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1808):20150749.

PMID: 25972471 PMC: 4455818. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0749.


Anatomically discrete sex differences in neuroplasticity in zebra finches as reflected by perineuronal nets.

Cornez G, Ter Haar S, Cornil C, Balthazart J PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0123199.

PMID: 25848776 PMC: 4388549. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123199.


Habitat-related differences in auditory processing of complex tones and vocal signal properties in four songbirds.

Lucas J, Velez A, Henry K J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015; 201(4):395-410.

PMID: 25682175 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-0986-7.


References
1.
Sohmer H, Pratt H, Kinarti R . Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1977; 42(5):656-64. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90282-6. View

2.
Del Negro C, Lehongre K, Edeline J . Selectivity of canary HVC neurons for the bird's own song: modulation by photoperiodic conditions. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(20):4952-63. PMC: 6724850. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4847-04.2005. View

3.
Chimento T, Schreiner C . Selectively eliminating cochlear microphonic contamination from the frequency-following response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990; 75(2):88-96. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90156-e. View

4.
Tramontin A, Brenowitz E . Seasonal plasticity in the adult brain. Trends Neurosci. 2000; 23(6):251-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01558-7. View

5.
Sisneros J, Forlano P, Deitcher D, Bass A . Steroid-dependent auditory plasticity leads to adaptive coupling of sender and receiver. Science. 2004; 305(5682):404-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1097218. View