» Articles » PMID: 17066263

Exploratory Factor Analysis: Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2006 Oct 27
PMID 17066263
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Strategies used by patients to promote health (SUPPH) was used to measure self-care self-efficacy in patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the extent to which self-efficacy theory explained the factor structure of the SUPPH and (2) to determine the relationship of demographic data with factors of the SUPPH. Subjects were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) and treated with either: (a) radical prostatectomy, (b) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) + radioactive seed implantation, or (c) IMRT + high dose rate. Subjects completed a demographic questionnaire and the SUPPH. Exploratory factor analysis of the SUPPH was performed using a varimax rotation. Subjects (n = 265) were predominately white and averaged 68 years of age. The model explained 81.3% of the total sum of eigenvalues. Two factors of the SUPPH were identified: physiological efficacy information and performance efficacy information. Younger subjects who were fully employed and earning more money had significantly higher performance self-efficacy than older subjects who were working part time and earning less money. Results are congruent with Bandura's (1997) description of self-efficacy. Use of the SUPPH may facilitate research validating Bandura's (1997) assertion that an individual's self-efficacy is related to quality of life (QOL) during chronic illness. Additional research focusing on self-efficacy and PCa patients' QOL may lead to efficacy enhancing interventions that will improve QOL of patients with PCa.

Citing Articles

Swedish massage as an adjunct approach to Help suppOrt individuals Pregnant after Experiencing a prior Stillbirth (HOPES): a convergent parallel mixed-methods single-arm feasibility trial protocol.

Fogarty S, Heazell A, Munk N, Hay P Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024; 10(1):67.

PMID: 38689324 PMC: 11059749. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01499-z.


Effect of high-quality nursing on psychological status and prognosis of patients undergoing brain tumor surgery.

Shi B, Wang L, Huang S Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(10):11974-11980.

PMID: 34786130 PMC: 8581912.


The effects of systematic psychological nursing on the sleep quality of schizophrenic patients with sleep disorders.

Li M, Lang B Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(6):7263-7269.

PMID: 34306491 PMC: 8290645.


Application of systematic nursing in patients with maniac access of bipolar disorder and its impact on treatment compliance and quality of life.

Wang X, Yu Y Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(6):6929-6936.

PMID: 34306445 PMC: 8290772.


Effect of integrated medical and nursing intervention model on quality of life and unhealthy emotion of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

Wang Z, Cheng Y, Li J, Hu X Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(4):3780-3786.

PMID: 34017565 PMC: 8129406.


References
1.
Lev E, Sanzero Eller L, Gejerman G, Lane P, Owen S, White M . Quality of life of men treated with brachytherapies for prostate cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2:28. PMC: 442132. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-28. View

2.
Vordermark D, Koelbl O . Quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer: no difference between surgery and radiotherapy?. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(24):4655. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.99.116. View

3.
Maliski S, Kwan L, Krupski T, Fink A, Orecklin J, Litwin M . Confidence in the ability to communicate with physicians among low-income patients with prostate cancer. Urology. 2004; 64(2):329-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.042. View

4.
Lev E, Daley K, Conner N, Reith M, Fernandez C, Owen S . An intervention to increase quality of life and self-care self-efficacy and decrease symptoms in breast cancer patients. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 2002; 15(3):277-94. View

5.
Glass T, De Leon C, Marottoli R, Berkman L . Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans. BMJ. 1999; 319(7208):478-83. PMC: 28199. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7208.478. View