The Hazards of Predicting Divorce Without Crossvalidation
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Divorce prediction studies (e.g., Gottman, Coan, Carrere, & Swanson, 1998) suggest that couples' eventual divorce can be very accurately predicted from a number of different variables. Recent attention to these studies has failed to consider the need to crossvalidate prediction equations and to consider the prevalence of divorce in the population. We analyze archival data to demonstrate that accuracy and predictive value drops precipitously during crossvalidation. We conclude that results of studies without crossvalidation analyses should be interpreted with extreme caution, no matter how impressive the initial results appear to be.
A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.
Ryjova Y, Gold A, Timmons A, Han S, Chaspari T, Pettit C J Fam Psychol. 2024; 38(3):453-465.
PMID: 38252084 PMC: 10963157. DOI: 10.1037/fam0001180.
Predicting couple therapy outcomes based on speech acoustic features.
Nasir M, Baucom B, Georgiou P, Narayanan S PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0185123.
PMID: 28934302 PMC: 5608311. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185123.
Markman H, Rhoades G, Stanley S, Ragan E, Whitton S J Fam Psychol. 2010; 24(3):289-98.
PMID: 20545402 PMC: 4298140. DOI: 10.1037/a0019481.
Couple psychoeducation for new parents: observed and potential effects on parenting.
Halford W, Petch J Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010; 13(2):164-80.
PMID: 20390356 DOI: 10.1007/s10567-010-0066-z.
Transformative processes in marriage: An analysis of emerging trends.
Fincham F, Stanley S, Beach S J Marriage Fam. 2011; 69(2):275-292.
PMID: 19890466 PMC: 2771855. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00362.x.