» Articles » PMID: 17063013

Acoustic Plus Electric Speech Processing: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant

Overview
Publisher Karger
Date 2006 Oct 26
PMID 17063013
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: This communication details the latest preliminary results from an ongoing multicenter single-subject design clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid 10-mm cochlear implant. Selection criteria, surgical strategies used for hearing preservation, and the benefits of preserved residual low-frequency hearing, improved word understanding in noise, and music appreciation are described.

Patients And Methods: The device has been implanted in 48 individuals with residual low-frequency hearing.

Results: Hearing preservation has been accomplished in 46/48 subjects. Acoustic speech perception has also been preserved. Combined acoustic plus electric speech processing has enabled most of this group of volunteers to gain improved word understanding as compared to their preoperative hearing with bilateral hearing aids. A subset of subjects with 12 months or more experience demonstrates CNC word understanding continues to improve more than 24 months after implantation. Improved word understanding in noise is also a benefit of acoustic plus electric speech processing.

Conclusions: The improvement of speech in noise and melody recognition is linked to the ability to distinguish fine pitch differences as the result of preserved residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Both of these measures are very important in real life to the hearing impaired. Preservation of residual low-frequency hearing should be considered when expanding candidate selection criteria for standard cochlear implants.

Citing Articles

Underlying dimensions of real-time word recognition in cochlear implant users.

McMurray B, Smith F, Huffman M, Rooff K, Muegge J, Jeppsen C Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7382.

PMID: 39209837 PMC: 11362525. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51514-3.


American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults.

Zeitler D, Prentiss S, Sydlowski S, Dunn C Laryngoscope. 2023; 134 Suppl 3:S1-S14.

PMID: 37435829 PMC: 10914083. DOI: 10.1002/lary.30879.


Differences in neural encoding of speech in noise between cochlear implant users with and without preserved acoustic hearing.

Shim H, Kim S, Hong J, Na Y, Woo J, Hansen M Hear Res. 2022; 427:108649.

PMID: 36462377 PMC: 9842477. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108649.


Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults Using Bimodal Hearing Configurations.

Holder J, Holcomb M, Snapp H, Labadie R, Vroegop J, Rocca C Otol Neurotol Open. 2022; 2(2).

PMID: 36274668 PMC: 9581116. DOI: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000011.


Preliminary study to determine an optimal mode for favorable residual hearing at low frequencies: Full electrical stimulation, electric acoustic stimulation, and electrical complement.

Jang J, Kim H, Choo O, Ha J, Mun H, Park H Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022; 7(4):1129-1135.

PMID: 36000067 PMC: 9392387. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.843.