» Articles » PMID: 17057068

Cartilage T2 Assessment: Differentiation of Normal Hyaline Cartilage and Reparative Tissue After Arthroscopic Cartilage Repair in Equine Subjects

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2006 Oct 24
PMID 17057068
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively assess T2 mapping characteristics of normal articular cartilage and of cartilage at sites of arthroscopic repair, including comparison with histologic results and collagen organization assessed at polarized light microscopy (PLM).

Materials And Methods: Study protocol was compliant with the Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines and approved by the institutional animal care committee. Arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) and microfracture arthroplasty (MFx) were performed in knees of 10 equine subjects (seven female, three male; age range, 3-5 years). A site of arthroscopically normal cartilage was documented in each joint as a control site. Joints were harvested at 12 (n = 5) and 24 (n = 5) weeks postoperatively and were imaged at 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) with a 10-echo sagittal fast spin-echo acquisition. T2 maps of each site (21 OAT harvest, 10 MFx, 12 OAT plug, and 10 control sites) were calculated with linear least-squares curve fitting. Cartilage T2 maps were qualitatively graded as "organized" (normal transition of low-to-high T2 signal from deep to superficial cartilage zones) or "disorganized." Quantitative mean T2 values were calculated for deep, middle, and superficial cartilage at each location. Results were compared with histologic and PLM assessments by using kappa analysis.

Results: T2 maps were qualitatively graded as organized at 20 of 53 sites and as disorganized at 33 sites. Perfect agreement was seen between organized T2 and histologic findings of hyaline cartilage and between disorganized T2 and histologic findings of fibrous reparative tissue (kappa = 1.0). Strong agreement was seen between organized T2 and normal PLM findings and between disorganized T2 and abnormal PLM findings (kappa = .92). Quantitative assessment of the deep, middle, and superficial cartilage, respectively, showed mean T2 values of 53.3, 58.6, and 54.9 msec at reparative fibrous tissue sites and 40.7, 53.6, and 61.6 msec at hyaline cartilage sites. A significant trend of increasing T2 values (from deep to superficial) was found in hyaline cartilage (P < .01). Fibrous tissue sites had no significant change with depth (P > .59).

Conclusion: Qualitative and quantitative T2 mapping helped differentiate hyaline cartilage from reparative fibrocartilage after cartilage repair at 1.5-T MR imaging.

Citing Articles

Tissue Engineering Construct for Articular Cartilage Restoration with Stromal Cells from Synovium vs. Dental Pulp-A Pre-Clinical Study.

Fernandes T, Santanna J, de Faria R, Pastore E, Bueno D, Hernandez A Pharmaceutics. 2025; 16(12.

PMID: 39771537 PMC: 11677368. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16121558.


Magnetic resonance imaging combined with histological evaluation of repair process using the microfracture technique in an association of osteocartilaginous and meniscal surgically induced lesions of the knee. In vivo experiment on a rabbit model.

Jr J, Florescu S, Brad S, Andor B, Ilia I, Stanciugelu S Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2024; 65(1):89-97.

PMID: 38527988 PMC: 11146455. DOI: 10.47162/RJME.65.1.11.


T2 mapping for quantitative assessment of ankle cartilage of weightlifters.

Wu W, Kang Z, Mu D, Zhao H, Yang F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19160.

PMID: 37932324 PMC: 10628267. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46259-w.


Application of quantitative T1, T2 and T2* mapping magnetic resonance imaging in cartilage degeneration of the shoulder joint.

Cao G, Gao S, Xiong B Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4558.

PMID: 36941288 PMC: 10027866. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31644-2.


Automated measurement of alpha angle on 3D-magnetic resonance imaging in femoroacetabular impingement hips: a pilot study.

Ewertowski N, Schleich C, Abrar D, Hosalkar H, Bittersohl B J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):370.

PMID: 35907886 PMC: 9338591. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03256-5.