» Articles » PMID: 17047912

Exploitation of Pepper EST-SSRs and an SSR-based Linkage Map

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Genetics
Date 2006 Oct 19
PMID 17047912
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As genome and cDNA sequencing projects progress, a tremendous amount of sequence information is becoming publicly available. These sequence resources can be exploited for gene discovery and marker development. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are among the most useful because of their great variability, abundance, and ease of analysis. By in silico analysis of 10,232 non-redundant expressed sequence tags (ESTs) in pepper as a source of SSR markers, 1,201 SSRs were found, corresponding to one SSR in every 3.8 kb of the ESTs. Eighteen percent of the SSR-ESTs were dinucleotide repeats, 66.0% were trinucleotide, 7.7% tetranucleotide, and 8.2% pentanucleotide; AAG (14%) and AG (12.4%) motifs were the most abundant repeat types. Based on the flanking sequences of these 1,201 SSRs, 812 primer pairs that satisfied melting temperature conditions and PCR product sizes were designed. 513 SSRs (63.1%) were successfully amplified and 150 of them (29.2%) showed polymorphism between Capsicum annuum 'TF68' and C. chinense 'Habanero'. Dinucleotide SSRs and EST-SSR markers containing AC-motifs were the most polymorphic. Polymorphism increased with repeat length and repeat number. The polymorphic EST-SSRs were mapped onto the previously generated pepper linkage map, using 107 F(2) individuals from an interspecific cross of TF68 x Habanero. One-hundred and thirtynine EST-SSRs were located on the linkage map in addition to 41 previous SSRs and 63 RFLP markers, forming 14 linkage groups (LGs) and spanning 2,201.5 cM. The EST-SSR markers were distributed over all the LGs. This SSR-based map will be useful as a reference map in Capsicum and should facilitate the use of molecular markers in pepper breeding.

Citing Articles

Ecology, genetic diversity, and population structure among commercial varieties and local landraces of spp. grown in northeastern states of India.

Verma V, Pandey A, Thirugnanavel A, Rymbai H, Dutta N, Kumar A Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1379637.

PMID: 38638355 PMC: 11024323. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1379637.


Development and Validation of Gene-Based SSR Markers in the Genus .

Akash M, Shiyab S, Saleh M, Hasan S, AbuHussein M, Al-Awaida W Scientifica (Cairo). 2023; 2023:6624354.

PMID: 37937238 PMC: 10627716. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6624354.


Disentangling potential genotypes for macro and micro nutrients and polymorphic markers in Chickpea.

Mittal N, Bhardwaj J, Verma S, Singh R, Yadav R, Kaur D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):10731.

PMID: 37400481 PMC: 10318058. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37602-2.


Molecular mapping of dominant gene responsible for leaf curl virus resistance in chilli pepper ( L.).

Thakur H, Jindal S, Sharma A, Dhaliwal M 3 Biotech. 2020; 10(4):182.

PMID: 32257738 PMC: 7103024. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02168-7.


Detection of quantitative trait loci for capsanthin content in pepper ( L.) at different fruit ripening stages.

Konishi A, Furutani N, Minamiyama Y, Ohyama A Breed Sci. 2019; 69(1):30-39.

PMID: 31086481 PMC: 6507717. DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.18070.


References
1.
Rudd S . Expressed sequence tags: alternative or complement to whole genome sequences?. Trends Plant Sci. 2003; 8(7):321-9. DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00131-6. View

2.
Kantety R, La Rota M, Matthews D, Sorrells M . Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. Plant Mol Biol. 2002; 48(5-6):501-10. DOI: 10.1023/a:1014875206165. View

3.
Taylor D, Ingvarsson P . Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals. Genetica. 2003; 117(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022308414864. View

4.
Lander E, Green P, ABRAHAMSON J, Barlow A, Daly M, Lincoln S . MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987; 1(2):174-81. DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. View

5.
Ewing B, Green P . Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998; 8(3):186-94. View