» Articles » PMID: 17043428

Diagnostic Relevance of Pressure-controlled Discography

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2006 Oct 18
PMID 17043428
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Discogenic pain is a leading cause of chronic low back pain. The authors investigated the efficacy of pressure-controlled discography to determine its role in clinical decision-making for the management of patients with discogenic pain. Pressure-controlled discography was performed in 21 patients (51 discs) with pain-provocation, followed by post-discography computerized tomography scans. Pain response was classified as positive response and negative response, and measured with visual analog scale scores. Discographic findings were graded by the modified Dallas discogram scale. Elastance, pain provocation on intradiscal pressure, pressure and volume of initial pain response, and pain response intensity were statistically analyzed. Elastance showed significant differences between Grade 0 and Grade 4 and 5. Decreased elastance with positive pain response group was a good indicator to imply that disc degeneration presumably is a pain generator. Results of pain response were well correlated with intradiscal pressure but not with the amount of injected volume. Among 31 discs of Grade 4 and 5, 74% showed negative pain response and 26% showed positive response. It was concluded that pressure-controlled discography was useful to diagnose discogenic pain and excellent guide in decision-making for spinal operations.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic discography: what is the clinical utility?.

Provenzano D Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011; 16(1):26-34.

PMID: 22147277 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-011-0239-6.


Clinical and radiological findings of discogenic low back pain confirmed by automated pressure-controlled discography.

Kim H, Shin D, Kim H, Yoo E, Shin D, Lee J J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 46(4):333-9.

PMID: 19893722 PMC: 2773390. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.4.333.


Automated pressure-controlled discography with constant injection speed and real-time pressure measurement.

Kim H, Shin D J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 46(1):16-22.

PMID: 19707489 PMC: 2729819. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.1.16.

References
1.
Osti O, Fraser R . MRI and discography of annular tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. A prospective clinical comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74(3):431-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587896. View

2.
Shin W, Kim H, Shin D, Shin D . Radiofrequency neurotomy of cervical medial branches for chronic cervicobrachialgia. J Korean Med Sci. 2006; 21(1):119-25. PMC: 2733959. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.1.119. View

3.
Pfirrmann C, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N . Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(17):1873-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011. View

4.
Lurie J, Birkmeyer N, Weinstein J . Rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(6):616-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049927.37696.DC. View

5.
Ausman J . I told you it was going to happen. Surg Neurol. 2004; 61(4):313-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.002. View