» Articles » PMID: 17027673

The Relationship Between Electrophysiological Correlates of Recollection and Amount of Information Retrieved

Overview
Journal Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Oct 10
PMID 17027673
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The electrophysiological correlates of recollection were investigated with a modified Remember/Know task in which subjects signaled whether they fully or partially recollected visual object information in each study episode. A positive-going ERP deflection--the left parietal old/new effect--was sensitive to the amount of information recollected, demonstrating greater amplitude when elicited by test items associated with full relative to partial recollection. These findings support prior proposals that the left parietal ERP old/new effect is sensitive to the amount of information recollected from episodic memory. An early-onsetting (ca. 150 ms), left frontal old/new effect differentiated items accorded correct old versus correct new responses regardless of whether the items were endorsed as familiar or recollected. This finding extends the range of circumstances under which early, frontally distributed old/new effects occur, and adds weight to previous suggestions that these effects are a neural correlate of familiarity-driven recognition memory.

Citing Articles

Consolidation improves the learning of new meanings for known words but not necessarily their integration into semantic memory.

Fang X, Perfetti C Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 39(3):351-366.

PMID: 38962374 PMC: 11219009. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2293853.


Electrophysiological analysis of signal detection outcomes emphasizes the role of decisional factors in recognition memory.

Schneider S, Coll S, Schnider A, Ptak R Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1358298.

PMID: 38571522 PMC: 10989682. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1358298.


Autobiographical Implicit Association Test and eye movements: fixations topography enables detection of autobiographical memories.

Zangrossi A, Gatto L, Lanfranchi V, Scarpazza C, Celli M, Sartori G Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1268256.

PMID: 38348265 PMC: 10859496. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268256.


A meta-analysis of event-related potential correlates of recognition memory.

Kwon S, Rugg M, Wiegand R, Curran T, Morcom A Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 30(6):2083-2105.

PMID: 37434046 PMC: 10728276. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02309-y.


Fronto-parietal single-trial brain connectivity benefits successful memory recognition.

Jun S, Joo Y, Sim Y, Pyo C, Ham K Transl Neurosci. 2023; 13(1):506-513.

PMID: 36660006 PMC: 9816457. DOI: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0265.


References
1.
Henson R, Rylands A, Ross E, Vuilleumeir P, Rugg M . The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Neuroimage. 2004; 21(4):1674-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.020. View

2.
Friedman D, Johnson Jr R . Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review. Microsc Res Tech. 2000; 51(1):6-28. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0029(20001001)51:1<6::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-R. View

3.
Lepsien J, Griffin I, Devlin J, Nobre A . Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load. Neuroimage. 2005; 26(3):733-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.026. View

4.
Rugg M, Otten L, Henson R . The neural basis of episodic memory: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002; 357(1424):1097-110. PMC: 1693015. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1102. View

5.
Yonelinas A, Otten L, Shaw K, Rugg M . Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(11):3002-8. PMC: 6725129. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-04.2005. View