» Articles » PMID: 17026695

Adverse Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome--a Descriptive Study in Singapore

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2006 Oct 10
PMID 17026695
Citations 141
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was first recognized in February 2003. It is the first severe and readily transmissible new disease to emerge in the 21st century. Healthcare workers in affected countries were exposed to the regular use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as the N95 mask, gloves, and gowns. Our aim was to study the prevalence of adverse skin reactions to PPE among healthcare workers in Singapore during the SARS outbreak. Healthcare staff in the National Skin Centre and Tan Tock Seng Hospital were surveyed using questionnaires. Of those asked to participate, 322 (94.7%) agreed. 14.3% of the respondents were doctors, 73.0% nurses, and 12.7% other ancillary staff. Mean age of respondents was 32.4 years, with the majority being women (85.7%) and Chinese (53.7%). 109 (35.5%) of the 307 staff who used masks regularly reported acne (59.6%), facial itch (51.4%), and rash (35.8%) from N95 mask use. 64 (21.4%) of the 299 who used gloves regularly reported dry skin (73.4%), itch (56.3%), and rash (37.5%). The use of PPE is associated with high rates of adverse skin reactions. There is a need to find suitable alternatives for affected staff and to encourage awareness among staff of the role of dermatologists in their care.

Citing Articles

Impact of infection prevention measures on the occurrence of cutaneous lesions and the quality of life of frontline and non-frontline healthcare workers: A multicentre cross-sectional study.

Sellami I, Abbes A, Haddar A, Feki A, Kotti N, Halweni H J Infect Prev. 2025; :17571774251324382.

PMID: 40051734 PMC: 11881100. DOI: 10.1177/17571774251324382.


Effects of Distance, Noise, and Personal Respiratory Protective Equipment on Speech Comprehension in Simulated Critical Care Setting.

Rojo-Rojo A, Martinez-Abril J, Munoz-Rubio G, Iniesta-Cortes P, Canovas-Pallares J Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(4).

PMID: 39997273 PMC: 11855685. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13040398.


The bacterial burden of worn face masks-observational research and literature review.

Kisielinski K, Wojtasik B, Zalewska A, Livermore D, Jurczak-Kurek A Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1460981.

PMID: 39691656 PMC: 11649673. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460981.


Exploration of the Changes in Facial Microbiota of Maskne Patients and Healthy Controls Before and After Wearing Masks Using 16 S rRNA Analysis.

Deng K, Tong X, Chen S, Wu G, Shi K, Chen H J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024; 14(3):947-961.

PMID: 38771488 PMC: 11442795. DOI: 10.1007/s44197-024-00240-6.


Guarding Our Guardians: Navigating Adverse Reactions in Healthcare Workers Amid Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Usage During COVID-19.

Pradhan S, Nimavat N, Mangrola N, Singh S, Lohani P, Mandala G Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58097.

PMID: 38738112 PMC: 11088754. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58097.


References
1.
Tan K, Greaves M . N95 acne. Int J Dermatol. 2004; 43(7):522-3. PMC: 7165725. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02338.x. View

2.
Tang M, Leow Y, Ng V, Koh D, Goh C . Latex sensitisation in healthcare workers in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005; 34(5):376-82. View