» Articles » PMID: 17021689

Characterisation of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque: Comparison Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histology

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2006 Oct 6
PMID 17021689
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify and characterise by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) carotid plaque constituents such as lipid-rich necrotic core, intraplaque haemorrhage and calcification in patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using histological evaluation as the reference standard.

Materials And Methods: Nineteen patients (13 men and six women) scheduled for CEA between March and August 2004 were imaged on a 1.5-T scanner (Magnetom Symphony, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The protocol included four types of sequences [T1, T2, proton density (PD) and three-dimensional time of flight (3D-TOF)]. Images were reviewed for integrity of the fibrous cap, presence of lipid-rich necrotic core, intraplaque haemorrhage and calcification. Signal intensity was assessed relative to the adjacent sternocleidomastoid muscle. Four cross-sections for each lesion were compared with the corresponding histological specimens and independently reviewed by two radiologists and one pathologist.

Results: MRI detected lipid-rich necrotic core with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.6% and 95.0%, respectively, whereas it defined intraplaque haemorrhage alone with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.6% and 100%, respectively. Calcification was recognised with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 93.7%, respectively.

Conclusions: MRI is able to identify signs of carotid plaque instability with a high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it may be useful in evaluating and guiding the treatment of haemodynamically nonsignificant stenoses with a potential embolic risk and, in the future, to assess coronary plaque.

Citing Articles

Imaging of Carotid Stenosis: Where Are We Standing? Comparison of Multiparametric Ultrasound, CT Angiography, and MRI Angiography, with Recent Developments.

David E, Grazhdani H, Aliotta L, Gavazzi L, Foti P, Palmucci S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202195 PMC: 11352936. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161708.


Comparison of the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of histologically defined vulnerable carotid plaque: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hou C, Xuan J, Zhao L, Li M, He W, Liu H Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(8):5814-5830.

PMID: 39143999 PMC: 11320555. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-540.


Diagnostics Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection of Atherosclerotic Plaque Characteristics in Carotid Arteries Compared to Histology: A Systematic Review.

Pakizer D, Kozel J, Elmers J, Feber J, Michel P, Skoloudik D J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024; 61(3):1067-1093.

PMID: 38981139 PMC: 11803704. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29522.


Novel Imaging-Based Biomarkers for Identifying Carotid Plaque Vulnerability.

Fernandez-Alvarez V, Linares-Sanchez M, Suarez C, Lopez F, Guntinas-Lichius O, Makitie A Biomolecules. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37627301 PMC: 10452902. DOI: 10.3390/biom13081236.


Vessel wall MR imaging of aortic arch, cervical carotid and intracranial arteries in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source: A narrative review.

Sakai Y, Lehman V, Eisenmenger L, Obusez E, Kharal G, Xiao J Front Neurol. 2022; 13:968390.

PMID: 35968273 PMC: 9366886. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.968390.