» Articles » PMID: 17012066

Community Neurorehabilitation: a Synthesis of Current Evidence and Future Research Directions

Overview
Journal NeuroRx
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Oct 3
PMID 17012066
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past decade, community neurorehabilitation has emerged as a promising extension of neurological rehabilitation. The goal of community neurorehabilitation is to maximize functional ability and quality of life through multidimensional rehabilitation that occurs while the individual is living in a home versus acute or transitory care setting. Because of its multidisciplinary focus, many variations of community neurorehabilitation teams have been implemented. Critical gaps exist, however, in understanding of the influence of structural and procedural differences among programs, as well as patient level variables such as social support, on recovery. This paper examines the current evidence of the effectiveness of community neurorehabilitation through a review of the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of four neurological conditions: stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, and Parkinson's disease. It focuses in particular on the data regarding physical therapy and occupational therapy, which are two of the primary components of community neurorehabilitation programs.

Citing Articles

Prioritizing Neuro-rehabilitation Services in Low-and Middle-income countries: Needs, Challenges and Possible Solutions.

Saluja A, Dhamija R Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022; 25(4):579-582.

PMID: 36211136 PMC: 9540924. DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_499_22.


Support service utilization and out-of-pocket payments for health services in a population-based sample of adults with neurological conditions.

Obembe A, Goldsmith C, Simpson L, Sakakibara B, Eng J PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0192911.

PMID: 29474391 PMC: 5825050. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192911.


Service use and costs for people with long-term neurological conditions in the first year following discharge from in-patient neuro-rehabilitation: a longitudinal cohort study.

Jackson D, McCrone P, Mosweu I, Siegert R, Turner-Stokes L PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e113056.

PMID: 25401992 PMC: 4234538. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113056.

References
1.
Barker R, Brauer S . Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005; 27(20):1213-23. DOI: 10.1080/09638280500075717. View

2.
DeJong G, Horn S, Conroy B, Nichols D, Healton E . Opening the black box of post-stroke rehabilitation: stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(12 Suppl 2):S1-S7. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.003. View

3.
Horn S, DeJong G, Smout R, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B . Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(12 Suppl 2):S101-S114. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.016. View

4.
Ottenbacher K . The post-stroke rehabilitation outcomes project. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(12 Suppl 2):S121-S123. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.001. View

5.
Shaughnessy M, Resnick B, Macko R . Testing a model of post-stroke exercise behavior. Rehabil Nurs. 2006; 31(1):15-21. DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2006.tb00005.x. View