» Articles » PMID: 17003396

Prediction of Germline Mutations and Cancer Risk in the Lynch Syndrome

Abstract

Context: Identifying families at high risk for the Lynch syndrome (ie, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) is critical for both genetic counseling and cancer prevention. Current clinical guidelines are effective but limited by applicability and cost.

Objective: To develop and validate a genetic counseling and risk prediction tool that estimates the probability of carrying a deleterious mutation in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 and the probability of developing colorectal or endometrial cancer.

Design, Setting, And Patients: External validation of the MMRpro model was conducted on 279 individuals from 226 clinic-based families in the United States, Canada, and Australia (referred between 1993-2005) by comparing model predictions with results of highly sensitive germline mutation detection techniques. MMRpro models the autosomal dominant inheritance of mismatch repair mutations, with parameters based on meta-analyses of the penetrance and prevalence of mutations and of the predictive values of tumor characteristics. The model's prediction is tailored to each individual's detailed family history information on colorectal and endometrial cancer and to tumor characteristics including microsatellite instability.

Main Outcome Measure: Ability of MMRpro to correctly predict mutation carrier status, as measured by operating characteristics, calibration, and overall accuracy.

Results: In the independent validation, MMRpro provided a concordance index of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.88) and a ratio of observed to predicted cases of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.05). This results in higher accuracy than existing alternatives and current clinical guidelines.

Conclusions: MMRpro is a broadly applicable, accurate prediction model that can contribute to current screening and genetic counseling practices in a high-risk population. It is more sensitive and more specific than existing clinical guidelines for identifying individuals who may benefit from MMR germline testing. It is applicable to individuals for whom tumor samples are not available and to individuals in whom germline testing finds no mutation.

Citing Articles

Comparison of PREMM5 and PREMMplus Risk Assessment Models to Identify Lynch Syndrome.

Biller L, Mittendorf K, Horiguchi M, Caruso A, Chittenden A, Ukaegbu C JCO Precis Oncol. 2025; 9:e2400691.

PMID: 39772830 PMC: 11723481. DOI: 10.1200/PO-24-00691.


Diagnostic Challenges due to a Germline Missense MSH2 Variant in a Patient With Immunotherapy-Responsive Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Evaristo G, Harmath C, Segal J, Shergill A, Setia N Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024; 7(12):e70037.

PMID: 39696980 PMC: 11655914. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.70037.


Characteristics of Cancer in Subjects Carrying Lynch Syndrome-Associated Gene Variants in Taiwanese Population: A Hospital-Based Study in Taiwan.

Chen Y, Hsiao T, Lin W, Liao Y, Liao S, Tsai H Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39518119 PMC: 11544957. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213682.


A new subtype of Lynch syndrome associated with c.354T>A (p. Y118*) identified in a Chinese family: case report and literature review.

Zhong L, Wang W, Duan Y, Song L, Li Z, Yang K Front Genet. 2024; 15:1440179.

PMID: 39440242 PMC: 11494679. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1440179.


Predictive Biomarkers and Resistance Mechanisms of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Malignant Solid Tumors.

Pavelescu L, Enache R, Rosu O, Profir M, Cretoiu S, Gaspar B Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).

PMID: 39273605 PMC: 11395316. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179659.


References
1.
Calistri D, Presciuttini S, Buonsanti G, Radice P, Gazzoli I, Pensotti V . Microsatellite instability in colorectal-cancer patients with suspected genetic predisposition. Int J Cancer. 2000; 89(1):87-91. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000120)89:1<87::aid-ijc14>3.0.co;2-9. View

2.
. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(12):2397-406. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. View

3.
Lamberti C, Kruse R, Ruelfs C, Caspari R, Wang Y, Jungck M . Microsatellite instability-a useful diagnostic tool to select patients at high risk for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a study in different groups of patients with colorectal cancer. Gut. 1999; 44(6):839-43. PMC: 1727554. DOI: 10.1136/gut.44.6.839. View

4.
Shia J, Klimstra D, Nafa K, Offit K, Guillem J, Markowitz A . Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 29(1):96-104. DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000146009.85309.3b. View

5.
Elston R, Stewart J . A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered. 1971; 21(6):523-42. DOI: 10.1159/000152448. View