» Articles » PMID: 17002942

Herbivory: Effects on Plant Abundance, Distribution and Population Growth

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2006 Sep 28
PMID 17002942
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plants are attacked by many different consumers. A critical question is how often, and under what conditions, common reductions in growth, fecundity or even survival that occur due to herbivory translate to meaningful impacts on abundance, distribution or dynamics of plant populations. Here, we review population-level studies of the effects of consumers on plant dynamics and evaluate: (i) whether particular consumers have predictably more or less influence on plant abundance, (ii) whether particular plant life-history types are predictably more vulnerable to herbivory at the population level, (iii) whether the strength of plant-consumer interactions shifts predictably across environmental gradients and (iv) the role of consumers in influencing plant distributional limits. Existing studies demonstrate numerous examples of consumers limiting local plant abundance and distribution. We found larger effects of consumers on grassland than woodland forbs, stronger effects of herbivory in areas with high versus low disturbance, but no systematic or unambiguous differences in the impact of consumers based on plant life-history or herbivore feeding mode. However, our ability to evaluate these and other patterns is limited by the small (but growing) number of studies in this area. As an impetus for further study, we review strengths and challenges of population-level studies, such as interpreting net impacts of consumers in the presence of density dependence and seed bank dynamics.

Citing Articles

Tolerance to insect herbivory increases with progressing plant development.

Gols R Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2024; 27(2):287-296.

PMID: 39720944 PMC: 11846633. DOI: 10.1111/plb.13757.


Mathematical modeling predicts that endemics by generalist insects are eradicated if nearly all plants produce constitutive defense.

Chakraborty S, Dwivedi S, Schuster S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25771.

PMID: 39468088 PMC: 11519633. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74771-0.


Tolerance Mitigates Gall Effects When Susceptible Plants Fail to Elicit Induced Defense.

Andrade J, Calixto E, Demetrio G, Venancio H, Meiado M, de Santana D Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38891281 PMC: 11174803. DOI: 10.3390/plants13111472.


How Effective Is Environmental Protection for Ensuring the Vitality of Wild Orchid Species? A Case Study of a Protected Area in Italy.

Scramoncin L, Gerdol R, Brancaleoni L Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38475457 PMC: 10935256. DOI: 10.3390/plants13050610.


Protection against insect predation during fruit development: the role of fleshy fruit wings of three species of in the cold desert of Central Asia.

Xie K, Qiu J, Mamut J, Li Y, Tan D Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1267714.

PMID: 38034578 PMC: 10682714. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1267714.


References
1.
Menges . Population viability analyses in plants: challenges and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000; 15(2):51-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01763-2. View

2.
Fagan W, Bishop J . Trophic Interactions during Primary Succession: Herbivores Slow a Plant Reinvasion at Mount St. Helens. Am Nat. 2000; 155(2):238-251. DOI: 10.1086/303320. View

3.
Nathan . Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000; 15(7):278-285. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01874-7. View

4.
Wills C, Condit R, Foster R, Hubbell S . Strong density- and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(4):1252-7. PMC: 19777. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1252. View

5.
Silliman B, Bertness M . A trophic cascade regulates salt marsh primary production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(16):10500-5. PMC: 124954. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.162366599. View