» Articles » PMID: 16985958

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Does Prostate Size Matter?

Overview
Journal Rev Urol
Date 2006 Sep 21
PMID 16985958
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent studies and analyses have confirmed that baseline prostate volume is related to progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as well as to negative outcomes related to BPH, such as acute urinary retention (AUR) and need for surgery, and can also predict response to therapy. Other investigations have determined that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level has good predictive value for assessing prostate volume. Strong evidence exists that baseline serum PSA level, like baseline prostate volume, predicts future prostate growth. Randomized placebo-controlled finasteride trials have shown that men with larger prostate volumes and higher PSA levels experience a clinically significant response to therapy compared with those with smaller prostate volumes and lower PSA levels. It has also been demonstrated that men with larger prostate glands and higher PSA levels are at increased risk for AUR and BPH-related surgery but that finasteride reduces these risks. Moreover, doxazosin and finasteride, alone and in combination, have been shown to significantly reduce BPH clinical progression.

Citing Articles

Long-term results of multimodal treatment of the prostate using the Thulium Laser.

Coman R, Leucuta D, Coman R, Lapusan C, Stanca D, Coman I Med Pharm Rep. 2024; 97(3):338-346.

PMID: 39234455 PMC: 11370861. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-2760.


Long-term functional outcomes and surgical retreatment after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: A 10-year follow-up study.

Manfredi C, Napolitano L, Ditonno F, Fusco G, Quattrone C, De Sio M Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50(3):309-318.

PMID: 38446905 PMC: 11152334. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0039.


Prostatic artery occlusion: initial findings on pathophysiological response in a canine prostate model.

Lucas-Cava V, Sanchez-Margallo F, Moreno-Lobato B, Davila-Gomez L, Lima-Rodriguez J, Garcia-Martinez V Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 11(12):1655-1666.

PMID: 36632152 PMC: 9827397. DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-423.


Transrectal Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer: Current Utilization, Integration with mpMRI, HIFU and Other Emerging Applications.

Panzone J, Byler T, Bratslavsky G, Goldberg H Cancer Manag Res. 2022; 14:1209-1228.

PMID: 35345605 PMC: 8957299. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S265058.


Current surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia and impression of new surgical modalities.

Al Khayal A, Balaraj F, Alferayan T, Alrabeeah K, Abumelha S Urol Ann. 2021; 13(2):95-100.

PMID: 34194132 PMC: 8210715. DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_75_20.


References
1.
Jacobsen S, Girman C, Guess H, Rhodes T, Oesterling J, Lieber M . Natural history of prostatism: longitudinal changes in voiding symptoms in community dwelling men. J Urol. 1996; 155(2):595-600. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66461-9. View

2.
Roehrborn C, Boyle P, BERGNER D, Gray T, Gittelman M, Shown T . Serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume predict long-term changes in symptoms and flow rate: results of a four-year, randomized trial comparing finasteride versus placebo. PLESS Study Group. Urology. 1999; 54(4):662-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00232-0. View

3.
Roehrborn C, Bruskewitz R, Nickel G, GLICKMAN S, Cox C, Anderson R . Urinary retention in patients with BPH treated with finasteride or placebo over 4 years. Characterization of patients and ultimate outcomes. The PLESS Study Group. Eur Urol. 2000; 37(5):528-36. DOI: 10.1159/000020189. View

4.
de la Rosette J, Kortmann B, Rossi C, Sonke G, Floratos D, Kiemeney L . Long-term risk of re-treatment of patients using alpha-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms. J Urol. 2002; 167(4):1734-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200204000-00035. View

5.
Marberger M, Andersen J, Nickel J, Malice M, Gabriel M, Pappas F . Prostate volume and serum prostate-specific antigen as predictors of acute urinary retention. Combined experience from three large multinational placebo-controlled trials. Eur Urol. 2000; 38(5):563-8. DOI: 10.1159/000020356. View