» Articles » PMID: 16983554

Early Distal Femoral Endoprosthetic Survival: Cemented Stems Versus the Compress Implant

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Sep 20
PMID 16983554
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aseptic loosening is well known following endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) using cemented intramedullary stems (CISs). The Compress (CPS) implant uses a novel spring system, achieving immediate, high compression fixation that induces bone hypertrophy and avoids stress shielding. We compared 26 oncologic distal femoral CPS patients treated at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF, USA) with 26 matched CIS patients from the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham (ROH, UK). The predominant diagnosis was osteosarcoma. Each centre had only one device-related prosthetic failure. In the short term these results show CPS to be safe and effective. We await longer follow-up to assess the ongoing potential for prosthetic failure.

Citing Articles

Evaluating functional outcomes and quality of life in musculoskeletal tumor patients with distal femoral megaprostheses: a case-control study.

Jover-Jorge N, Gonzalez-Rojo P, Amaya-Valero J, Baixuali-Garcia F, Calva-Ceinos C, Angulo-Sanchez M World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):341.

PMID: 39707433 PMC: 11662794. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03627-8.


The survival and complication profiles of the Compress® Endoprosthesis: A systematic review and -analysis.

Li H, Zhang X, Li X, Shen J, Yin J, Zou C J Bone Oncol. 2024; 47:100623.

PMID: 39157743 PMC: 11327388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100623.


Functional and Oncological Outcome of Patients with Distal Femoral Osteosarcoma Managed by Limb Salvage Using Modular Endoprosthesis.

Sadek W, Ebeid W, El Ghoneimy A, Ebeid E, Senna W Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 30(8):5150-5158.

PMID: 37273024 PMC: 10319677. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13679-x.


Osseointegration reduces aseptic loosening of primary distal femoral implants in pediatric and adolescent osteosarcoma patients: a retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Welsh C, Hull P, Meckmongkol T, Mumith A, Lovejoy J, Giangarra C Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 33(8):3585-3596.

PMID: 37246989 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03590-2.


A comparison of cemented and cementless intra-neck curved stem use during hip-preserving reconstruction following massive femoral malignant tumor removal.

You Q, Lu M, Min L, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y Front Oncol. 2022; 12:933057.

PMID: 36132148 PMC: 9483172. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.933057.


References
1.
Grimer R, Belthur M, Chandrasekar C, Carter S, Tillman R . Two-stage revision for infected endoprostheses used in tumor surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (395):193-203. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200202000-00022. View

2.
Nichter L, Menendez L . Reconstructive considerations for limb salvage surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993; 24(3):511-21. View

3.
Horowitz S, Glasser D, Lane J, Healey J . Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma. How long do the reconstructions last?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (293):280-6. View

4.
Mittermayer F, Windhager R, Dominkus M, Krepler P, Schwameis E, Sluga M . Revision of the Kotz type of tumour endoprosthesis for the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(3):401-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.12204. View

5.
Malawer M, Chou L . Prosthetic survival and clinical results with use of large-segment replacements in the treatment of high-grade bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(8):1154-65. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199508000-00003. View