» Articles » PMID: 16977345

Effects of Different Kinds of Meshes on Postoperative Adhesion Formation in the New Zealand White Rabbit

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2006 Sep 16
PMID 16977345
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different kinds of surgical meshes on postoperative adhesion formation. Forty-two New Zealand White rabbits were studied. The rabbits were grouped into six groups, according to the type of surgical meshes (Prolene, Mersilene, Vypro, polytetraflouroethylene (PTFE), Proceed and control group) implanted into the peritoneum cavity. Thirty days after the operation, the relaparotomies were carried out, and any adhesions observed between the implanted mesh and tissues were evaluated and graded. The mean adhesion degree was 9.2 in the Mersilene mesh group, 9.5 in the Prolene mesh group, 9.7 and in the Vypro mesh group (P > 0.05). The mean adhesion degree was 1 in the control group, 2.75 in the Proceed mesh group and 2.25 in the PTFE mesh group. There was a significant difference in adhesion degree between the control, Proceed and PTFE groups and the Prolene, Mersilene and Vypro mesh groups. The adhesion degree was significantly lower in the Proceed and PTFE mesh groups when comparing them with the Prolene, Mersilene and Vypro meshes.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted mesh pelvic closure for locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

Rusli S, Choo J, Piozzi G, Kim S J Surg Case Rep. 2021; 2021(11):rjab524.

PMID: 34858579 PMC: 8634069. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab524.


Dried human amniotic membrane as an antiadherent layer for intraperitoneal placing of polypropylene mesh in rats.

Di Loreto F, Mangione A, Palmisano E, Cerda J, Dominguez M, Ponce G Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(4):1435-40.

PMID: 23392973 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2604-x.


Functional cine MRI and transabdominal ultrasonography for the assessment of adhesions to implanted synthetic mesh 5-7 years after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Zinther N, Zeuten A, Marinovskij E, Haislund M, Wara P, Friis-Andersen H Hernia. 2010; 14(5):499-504.

PMID: 20490585 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-010-0676-x.


Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model.

Zinther N, Wara P, Friis-Andersen H Hernia. 2010; 14(3):283-9.

PMID: 20054597 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-009-0622-y.


Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Eriksen J, Gogenur I, Rosenberg J Hernia. 2007; 11(6):481-92.

PMID: 17846703 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-007-0282-8.

References
1.
Sodji M, Rogier R, Durand-Fontanier S, Lachachi F, Cheynel N, Lombin L . [Composite, non-resorbable parietal prosthesis with polyethylene terephtalate-polyurethane (HI-TEX PARP NT): prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions. Experimental study in rabbits]. Ann Chir. 2001; 126(6):549-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3944(01)00550-8. View

2.
LeBlanc K, Booth W, Whitaker J, Baker D . In vivo study of meshes implanted over the inguinal ring and external iliac vessels in uncastrated pigs. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(3):247-51. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900644. View

3.
Naim J, Pulley D, Scanlan K, HINSHAW J, Lanzafame R . Reduction of postoperative adhesions to Marlex mesh using experimental adhesion barriers in rats. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1993; 3(2):187-90. DOI: 10.1089/lps.1993.3.187. View

4.
Borrazzo E, Belmont M, Boffa D, Fowler D . Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia. 2003; 8(2):108-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-003-0181-6. View

5.
JACOBSON L, Kirton O, Gomez G . The use of an absorbable mesh wrap in the management of major liver injuries. Surgery. 1992; 111(4):455-61. View