» Articles » PMID: 16971175

Real-time PCR for Mumps Diagnosis on Clinical Specimens--comparison with Results of Conventional Methods of Virus Detection and Nested PCR

Overview
Journal J Clin Virol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2006 Sep 15
PMID 16971175
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Since November 2003, the UK has seen a dramatic rise in the number of mumps cases, resulting in increasing demands on virology laboratories to confirm mumps infection in a timely and efficient manner. Traditional mumps virus detection methods are often insensitive, lengthy, and cumbersome. Some laboratories in the UK now use molecular methods that are based on nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Early serological diagnosis often relies on detection of anti-mumps IgM, which may be absent in the first 10 days of illness.

Objectives: We compared a one-step real-time RT-PCR with an established nested PCR (SH-PCR) and virus detection by culture and antigen detection, and assessed the clinical usefulness of mumps real-time PCR for diagnosis from CSF.

Study Design: In total, 280 clinical samples were investigated by real-time PCR, nested PCR and a combination of traditional virus detection methods (antigen detection on oral samples, cell culture on all samples). Furthermore, 88 CSF samples submitted for diagnosis of possible viral meningitis were analysed by real-time PCR.

Results: The real-time PCR detected the highest number of positive oral samples (119/180) compared to SH-PCR (92/180) and combined virus culture and antigen detection procedures (90/180). Sensitivity of mumps virus detection in urine was poor for all three methods: 34.0% (traditional detection), 29.8% (real-time PCR) and 2.1% (SH-PCR), respectively. Real-time PCR on 88 CSF samples identified five patients with mumps meningitis, significantly increasing viral diagnosis in this cohort.

Conclusion: Real-time PCR on oral samples is the investigation of choice for mumps infection. Mumps virus detection in urine by any of the PCRs used was clearly less successful. Real-time PCR on CSF samples seems a promising adjunct for diagnosis of mumps meningitis, especially in an age group with high incidence of mumps.

Citing Articles

Wastewater surveillance beyond COVID-19: a ranking system for communicable disease testing in the tri-county Detroit area, Michigan, USA.

Gentry Z, Zhao L, Faust R, David R, Norton J, Xagoraraki I Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1178515.

PMID: 37333521 PMC: 10272568. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178515.


Micro/nanotechnology-inspired rapid diagnosis of respiratory infectious diseases.

Homayoonnia S, Lee Y, Andalib D, Rahman M, Shin J, Kim K Biomed Eng Lett. 2021; 11(4):335-365.

PMID: 34513114 PMC: 8424173. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-021-00206-8.


Mumps: MMR vaccination and genetic diversity of mumps virus, 2007-2011 in Catalonia, Spain.

Barrabeig I, Anton A, Torner N, Pumarola T, Costa J, Dominguez A BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19(1):954.

PMID: 31706275 PMC: 6842476. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4496-z.


A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology.

Miller J, Binnicker M, Campbell S, Carroll K, Chapin K, Gilligan P Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 67(6):e1-e94.

PMID: 29955859 PMC: 7108105. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy381.


Laboratory testing and phylogenetic analysis during a mumps outbreak in Ontario, Canada.

LHuillier A, Eshaghi A, Racey C, Ogbulafor K, Lombos E, Higgins R Virol J. 2018; 15(1):98.

PMID: 29866178 PMC: 5987625. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-018-0996-5.