» Articles » PMID: 16967260

European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): Consensus Statement on CT Colonography

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2006 Sep 13
PMID 16967260
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapid clinical dissemination of CT colonography (CTC) is occurring in parallel with continued research into technique optimisation and diagnostic performance. A need exists therefore for current guidance as to basic prerequisites for effective clinical implementation. A questionnaire detailing CTC technique, analysis, training and clinical implementation was developed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) CTC committee and circulated to all faculty members of previous ESGAR "hands-on" CTC training courses. Responses were collated and a consensus statement produced. Of 27 invited to participate, 24 responded. Reasonable consensus was reached on bowel preparation, colonic distension, patient positioning, use of IV contrast and optimal scan parameters. Both primary 2D and primary 3D analysis were advocated equally, with some evidence that more experienced readers prefer primary 2D. Training was universally recommended, although there was no consensus regarding minimum requirements. CTC was thought superior to barium enema, although recommended for screening only in the presence of validated local experience. There was consensus that polyps 4 mm or less could be ignored assuming agreement from local gastroenterological colleagues. There is increasing consensus amongst European experts as to the current best practice in CTC.

Citing Articles

Clinical utility of colon capsule endoscopy: a moving target?.

Jalayeri Nia G, Arasaradnam R, Koulaouzidis A Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023; 16:17562848231195680.

PMID: 37822570 PMC: 10563479. DOI: 10.1177/17562848231195680.


CT colonography: what the gastroenterologist needs to know.

Wylie P, Burling D Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017; 2(2):96-104.

PMID: 28839590 PMC: 5517201. DOI: 10.1136/fg.2009.000380.


Assessment of the Incremental Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) for Interpretation of CT Colonography by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers.

Boone D, Mallett S, McQuillan J, Taylor S, Altman D, Halligan S PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0136624.

PMID: 26355745 PMC: 4565691. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136624.


Fecal tag CT colonography with a limited 2-day bowel preparation following incomplete colonoscopy.

Meric K, Bakal N, Aydin S, Yesil A, Tekesin K, Simsek M Jpn J Radiol. 2015; 33(6):329-35.

PMID: 25895857 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-015-0421-6.


Comparison of a 4-Day versus 2-Day Low Fiber Diet Regimen in Barium Tagging CT Colonography in Incomplete Colonoscopy Patients.

Meric K, Bakal N, Senates E, Aydin S, Kilicoglu Z, Ulger F Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015; 2015:609150.

PMID: 25873945 PMC: 4385636. DOI: 10.1155/2015/609150.


References
1.
Rex D . PRO: Patients with polyps smaller than 1 cm on computed tomographic colonography should be offered colonoscopy and polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100(9):1903-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50130_2.x. View

2.
Burling D, Halligan S, Taylor S, Usiskin S, Bartram C . CT colonography practice in the UK: a national survey. Clin Radiol. 2003; 59(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2003.09.008. View

3.
Summers R, Yao J, Pickhardt P, Franaszek M, Bitter I, Brickman D . Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129(6):1832-44. PMC: 1576342. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.054. View

4.
Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Dymarkowski S, Gevers A, Rutgeerts P . Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12(6):1410-5. DOI: 10.1007/s003300101082. View

5.
Barish M, Soto J, Ferrucci J . Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(3):786-92. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840786. View