» Articles » PMID: 16954986

Lateral Tympanoplasty for Total or Near-total Perforation: Prognostic Factors

Overview
Journal Laryngoscope
Date 2006 Sep 7
PMID 16954986
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify prognostic factors affecting outcome in lateral tympanoplasty for total or near-total tympanic membrane perforation.

Study Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: Patients were those presenting with total or near-total tympanic membrane perforation undergoing lateral tympanoplasty from 1999 to 2004. We systematically collected demographic, clinical, audiologic, and outcome information. Student t test was used to determine group differences. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between success of grafting (dependent variable) and the independent variables. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) and independent variables.

Results: There were seventy-seven cases (58 primary and 19 revision cases) with average follow-up of 17 months. Successful tympanic membrane grafting occurred in 91% of cases. None of the independent variables studied was predictive of the success of graft incorporation (P > .05). The mean preoperative ABG was 29.8 +/- 10 dB and improved to a postoperative ABG of 16.5 +/- 11 dB (P < .001). Smaller preoperative ABG and normal malleus handle were associated with smaller postoperative ABG. In revision cases, mastoidectomy was associated with better functional results.

Conclusions: Successful grafting of near-total and total tympanic membrane perforations occurred in 91% of the cases and was independent of demographic, disease, and technical variables. Disease variables (preoperative ABG and status of malleus handle) had a greater prognostic value on postoperative ABG than other variables. In revision tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy is associated with a better functional outcome.

Citing Articles

Transcanal Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty: Is There a Difference in Perforation Closure Rates?.

Mitton T, Kim J, Killeen D, Hunter J, Isaacson B, Kutz Jr J Otol Neurotol Open. 2024; 2(3):e016.

PMID: 38516628 PMC: 10950148. DOI: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000016.


Patient Factors Predicting Success in Lateral Graft Tympanoplasty.

Momin Z, Yancey K, Mitton T, Kutz Jr J Otol Neurotol Open. 2024; 2(3):e015.

PMID: 38516625 PMC: 10950160. DOI: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000015.


Inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap approach for the repair of large marginal perforations.

Zhang Y, Lou Z BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):378.

PMID: 38093229 PMC: 10717025. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02286-y.


Type 1 Revision Tympanoplasty Using Tragal Cartilage in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Prospective Observational Study.

Patil K, Anil Kumar R, Satish H Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022; 74(Suppl 1):575-580.

PMID: 36032918 PMC: 9411312. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02400-7.


Comparison of endoscopic underlay and over-under tympanoplasty techniques for type I tympanoplasty.

Bao J, Zhan K, Wick C Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022; 7(4):1186-1193.

PMID: 36000055 PMC: 9392374. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.879.