» Articles » PMID: 16954236

Evaluation of the SPF10-INNO LiPA Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotyping Test and the Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2006 Sep 7
PMID 16954236
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The need for accurate genotyping of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections is becoming increasingly important, since (i) the oncogenic potential among the high-risk HPV genotypes varies in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer, (ii) monitoring multivalent HPV vaccines is essential to investigate the efficiency of the vaccines, and (iii) genotyping is crucial in epidemiologic studies evaluating HPV infections worldwide. Various genotyping assays have been developed to meet this demand. Comparison of different studies that use various HPV genotyping tests is possible only after a performance assessment of the different assays. In the present study, the SPF(10) LiPA version 1 and the recently launched Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping assays are compared. A total of 573 liquid-based cytology samples were tested for the presence of HPV by a DNA enzyme immunoassay; 210 were found to be positive for HPV DNA and were evaluated using both genotyping assays (163 with normal cytology, 22 with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 20 with mild/moderate dysplasia, and 5 with severe dysplasia). Comparison analysis was limited to the HPV genotype probes common to both assays. Of the 160 samples used for comparison analysis, 129 (80.6%) showed absolute agreement between the assays (concordant), 18 (11.2%) showed correspondence for some but not all genotypes detected on both strips (compatible), and the remaining 13 (8.2%) samples did not show any similarity between the tests (discordant). The overall intertest comparison agreement for all individually detectable genotypes was considered very good (kappa value, 0.79). The genotyping assays were therefore highly comparable and reproducible.

Citing Articles

Human Papilloma Virus Infection in Men: A Specific Human Virome or a Specific Pathology?.

culav I, Skerlev M, Starcevic L, Hrabac P, Ljubojevic Hadzavdic S, Beslic I Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 40004559 PMC: 11855728. DOI: 10.3390/genes16020230.


Head-to-head comparison of 7 high-sensitive human papillomavirus nucleic acid detection technologies with the SPF10 LiPA-25 system.

Yin J, Cheng S, Liu D, Tian Y, Hu F, Zhang Z J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 2(3):148-154.

PMID: 39036447 PMC: 11256530. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.06.003.


Association Between Cervical Inflammatory Mediators and Prevalent Cervical Human Papillomavirus Infection.

Olukomogbon T, Akpobome B, Omole A, Adebamowo C, Adebamowo S JCO Glob Oncol. 2024; 10:e2300380.

PMID: 38547441 PMC: 10994421. DOI: 10.1200/GO.23.00380.


Discrimination of human papillomavirus genotypes using innovative technique nested-high resolution melting.

Alirezaei M, Mosawi S, Afgar A, Zarean M, Movahhed T, Abbasi V Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13943.

PMID: 35977949 PMC: 9382607. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14730-9.


Detection of Five Types of HPV Genotypes Causing Anogenital Warts (Condyloma Acuminatum) Using PCR-Tm Analysis Technology.

Wu L, Wang W, Zhang J, Wu X, Chen Y, Gu X Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:857410.

PMID: 35655998 PMC: 9152731. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.857410.


References
1.
Remmink A, Walboomers J, Helmerhorst T, Voorhorst F, Rozendaal L, Risse E . The presence of persistent high-risk HPV genotypes in dysplastic cervical lesions is associated with progressive disease: natural history up to 36 months. Int J Cancer. 1995; 61(3):306-11. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910610305. View

2.
Sherman M, Schiffman M, Lorincz A, Herrero R, Hutchinson M, Bratti C . Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing. Cancer. 1997; 81(2):89-97. View

3.
Cuzick J, Terry G, Ho L, Hollingworth T, Anderson M . Type-specific human papillomavirus DNA in abnormal smears as a predictor of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Cancer. 1994; 69(1):167-71. PMC: 1968760. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.28. View

4.
Lee K, Ashfaq R, Birdsong G, Corkill M, McIntosh K, Inhorn S . Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90(2):278-84. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00228-7. View

5.
Kleter B, van Doorn L, Ter Schegget J, Schrauwen L, van Krimpen K, Burger M . Novel short-fragment PCR assay for highly sensitive broad-spectrum detection of anogenital human papillomaviruses. Am J Pathol. 1998; 153(6):1731-9. PMC: 1866345. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65688-X. View