» Articles » PMID: 16952977

Prediction of Stroke by Home "morning" Versus "evening" Blood Pressure Values: the Ohasama Study

Overview
Journal Hypertension
Date 2006 Sep 6
PMID 16952977
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Predictive power of self-measured blood pressure at home (home BP) for cardiovascular disease risk has been reported to be higher than casual-screening BP. However, the differential prognostic significance of home BP in the morning (morning BP) and in the evening (evening BP), respectively, has not been elucidated. In the Ohasama study, 1766 subjects (>or=40 years) were followed up for an average of 11 years. The predictive power for stroke incidence of evening BP was compared with that of morning BP as continuous variables. The Cox regression model demonstrated that evening BP and morning BP predicted future stroke risk equally. Subjects were also assigned to 1 of 4 categories based on home BP. In this analysis, stroke risk in morning hypertension ([HT] morning BP >or=135/85 mm Hg and evening BP <135/85 mm Hg; relative hazard (RH): 2.66; 95% CI:1.64 to 4.33) and that in sustained HT(morning BP and evening BP >or=135/85 mm Hg; RH: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.65 to 3.45) was significantly higher than that in normotension (morning BP and evening BP <135/85 mm Hg). The risk in morning HT was more remarkable in subjects taking antihypertensive medication (RH: 3.55; 95% CI: 1.70 to 7.38). Although the risk in evening HT (morning BP <135/85 mm Hg and evening BP >or=135/85 mm Hg) was higher than that in normotension, the differences were not significant. In conclusion, morning BP and evening BP provide equally useful information for stroke risk, whereas morning HT, which indicates HT specifically observed in the morning, might be a good predictor of stroke, particularly among individuals using anti-HT medication.

Citing Articles

Home blood pressure control and prescribing patterns of anti-hypertensive medications in a home blood pressure-based hypertension-specialized clinic in Japan: a sub-analysis of the Ohasama study.

Satoh M, Metoki H, Murakami T, Tatsumi Y, Asayama K, Kikuya M Hypertens Res. 2024; 48(1):26-36.

PMID: 39463432 PMC: 11700850. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01954-7.


The utility of home blood pressure load in predicting average self-measured blood pressure.

Hinderliter A, Lin F, Yang Y, Viera L, Olsson E, Voora R J Hypertens. 2024; 42(9):1624-1631.

PMID: 38860390 PMC: 11293963. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003776.


Self-measured home blood pressure highlights cardiovascular risk in women: the HOMED-BP study.

Ohata C, Asayama K, Hosaka M, Nomura K, Yamamura T, Kimura T Hypertens Res. 2023; 46(10):2400-2408.

PMID: 37592040 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-023-01408-6.


Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics including Patterns of Antihypertensive Drug Administration of the Different Home Blood Pressure Phenotypes in Treated Hypertensive Patients.

Chotruangnapa C, Thammarux T, Thongdang P Int J Hypertens. 2022; 2022:6912839.

PMID: 36532604 PMC: 9754835. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6912839.


Standardized home blood pressure monitoring: Rationale behind the 722 protocol.

Lin H, Pan H, Chen C, Cheng H, Chia Y, Sogunuru G J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022; 24(9):1161-1173.

PMID: 36196472 PMC: 9532917. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14549.