» Articles » PMID: 16952915

Temporal Sensitivity in a Hemianopic Visual Field Can Be Improved by Long-term Training Using Flicker Stimulation

Overview
Date 2006 Sep 6
PMID 16952915
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Blindness of a visual half-field (hemianopia) is a common symptom after postchiasmatic cerebral lesions. Although hemianopia severely limits activities of daily life, current clinical practice comprises no training of visual functions in the blind hemifield.

Objective: To find out whether flicker sensitivity in the blind hemifield can be improved with intensive training, and whether training with flicker stimulation can evoke changes in cortical responsiveness.

Methods: Two men with homonymous hemianopia participated in the experiments. They trained with flicker stimuli at 30 degrees or with flickering letters at 10 degrees eccentricity twice a week for a year, and continued training with more peripheral stimuli thereafter. Neuromagnetic responses were registered at 1-2-month intervals, and the Goldmann perimetry was recorded before, during and after training.

Results: Flicker sensitivity in the blind hemifield improved to the level of the intact hemifield within 30 degrees eccentricity in one participant and 20 degrees eccentricity in the other. Flickering letters were recognised equally at 10 degrees eccentricity in the blind and intact hemifields. Improvement spread from the stimulated horizontal meridian to the whole hemianopic field within 30 degrees. Before training, neuromagnetic recordings showed no signal above the noise level in the hemianopic side. During training, evoked fields emerged in both participants. No changes were found in the Goldmann perimetry.

Discussion: Results show that sensitivity to flicker could be fully restored in the stimulated region, that improvement in sensitivity spreads to the surrounding neuronal networks, and that, during training, accompanying changes occurred in the neuromagnetic fields.

Citing Articles

Persistence of training-induced visual improvements after occipital stroke.

Willis H, Farenthold B, Millington-Truby R, Willis R, Starling L, Cavanaugh M medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39502666 PMC: 11537328. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.24.24316036.


Training in Cortically Blinded Fields Appears to Confer Patient-Specific Benefit Against Retinal Thinning.

Fahrenthold B, Cavanaugh M, Tamhankar M, Lam B, Feldon S, Johnson B Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(4):29.

PMID: 38635245 PMC: 11033601. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.4.29.


Limited restoration of contrast sensitivity with training after V1 damage in humans.

Yang J, Saionz E, Cavanaugh M, Fahrenthold B, Melnick M, Tadin D eNeuro. 2024; .

PMID: 38395611 PMC: 10941636. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0020-24.2024.


Functional connectivity interacts with visual perceptual learning for visual field recovery in chronic stroke.

Namgung E, Kim Y, Lee E, Sasaki Y, Watanabe T, Kang D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3247.

PMID: 38332042 PMC: 10853510. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52778-x.


Training in cortically-blind fields confers patient-specific benefit against retinal thinning after occipital stroke.

Fahrenthold B, Cavanaugh M, Tamhankar M, Lam B, Feldon S, Johnson B medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38196617 PMC: 10775322. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.19.23298260.


References
1.
Pelli D, Zhang L . Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Res. 1991; 31(7-8):1337-50. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90055-a. View

2.
Kasten E, Wust S, Behrens-Baumann W, Sabel B . Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Nat Med. 1998; 4(9):1083-7. DOI: 10.1038/2079. View

3.
Blake D, Byl N, Merzenich M . Representation of the hand in the cerebral cortex. Behav Brain Res. 2002; 135(1-2):179-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00163-8. View

4.
Nasanen R, Ojanpaa H, Kojo I . Effect of stimulus contrast on performance and eye movements in visual search. Vision Res. 2001; 41(14):1817-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00056-6. View

5.
Taulu S, Kajola M, Simola J . Suppression of interference and artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method. Brain Topogr. 2004; 16(4):269-75. DOI: 10.1023/b:brat.0000032864.93890.f9. View