» Articles » PMID: 16951072

A Chip off the Old Block: a Model for the Evolution of Genomic Imprinting Via Selection for Parental Similarity

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2006 Sep 5
PMID 16951072
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A consequence of genomic imprinting is that offspring are more similar to one parent than to the other, depending on which parent's genes are inactivated in those offspring. We hypothesize that genomic imprinting may have evolved at some loci because of selection to be similar to the parent of one sex or the other. We construct and analyze an evolutionary-genetic model of a two-locus two-deme system, in which one locus codes for a character under local selection and the second locus is a potential cis-acting modifier of imprinting. A proportion of males only migrate between demes every generation, and prebreeding males are less fit, on average, than females. We examine the conditions in which an imprinting modifier allele can invade a population fixed for a nonimprinting modifier allele and vice versa. We find that the conditions under which the imprinting modifier invades are biologically restrictive (high migration rates and high values of recombination between the two loci) and thus this hypothesis is unlikely to explain the evolution of imprinting. Our modeling also shows that, as with several other hypotheses, polymorphism of imprinting status may evolve under certain circumstances, a feature not predicted by verbal accounts.

Citing Articles

The evolution of genomic imprinting: theories, predictions and empirical tests.

Patten M, Ross L, Curley J, Queller D, Bonduriansky R, Wolf J Heredity (Edinb). 2014; 113(2):119-28.

PMID: 24755983 PMC: 4105453. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.29.


Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Spencer H, Clark A Heredity (Edinb). 2014; 113(2):112-8.

PMID: 24398886 PMC: 4105448. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.129.


Coadaptation and conflict, misconception and muddle, in the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Haig D Heredity (Edinb). 2013; 113(2):96-103.

PMID: 24129605 PMC: 4105449. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.97.


Evolution of genomic imprinting as a coordinator of coadapted gene expression.

Wolf J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(13):5085-90.

PMID: 23479614 PMC: 3612623. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1205686110.


How demography, life history, and kinship shape the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Van Cleve J, Feldman M, Lehmann L Am Nat. 2010; 176(4):440-55.

PMID: 20738206 PMC: 2989731. DOI: 10.1086/656277.


References
1.
Spencer H, Feldman M, Clark A . Genetic conflicts, multiple paternity and the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics. 1998; 148(2):893-904. PMC: 1459836. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/148.2.893. View

2.
Bunzel R, Blumcke I, Cichon S, Normann S, Schramm J, Propping P . Polymorphic imprinting of the serotonin-2A (5-HT2A) receptor gene in human adult brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1998; 59(1):90-2. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-328x(98)00146-6. View

3.
Iwasa Y . The conflict theory of genomic imprinting: how much can be explained?. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1998; 40:255-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60369-5. View

4.
Jinno Y, Yun K, Nishiwaki K, Kubota T, Ogawa O, Reeve A . Mosaic and polymorphic imprinting of the WT1 gene in humans. Nat Genet. 1994; 6(3):305-9. DOI: 10.1038/ng0394-305. View

5.
Morison I, Ramsay J, Spencer H . A census of mammalian imprinting. Trends Genet. 2005; 21(8):457-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.008. View