» Articles » PMID: 16950846

Filament Compliance Effects Can Explain Tension Overshoots During Force Development

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2006 Sep 5
PMID 16950846
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spatially explicit stochastic simulations of myosin S1 heads attaching to a single actin filament were used to investigate the process of force development in contracting muscle. Filament compliance effects were incorporated by adjusting the spacing between adjacent actin binding sites and adjacent myosin heads in response to cross-bridge attachment/detachment events. Appropriate model parameters were determined by multi-dimensional optimization and used to simulate force development records corresponding to different levels of Ca(2+) activation. Simulations in which the spacing between both adjacent actin binding sites and adjacent myosin S1 heads changed by approximately 0.06 nm after cross-bridge attachment/detachment events 1), exhibited tension overshoots with a Ca(2+) dependence similar to that measured experimentally and 2), mimicked the observed k(tr)-relative tension relationship without invoking a Ca(2+)-dependent increase in the rate of cross-bridge state transitions. Tension did not overshoot its steady-state value in control simulations modeling rigid thick and thin filaments with otherwise identical parameters. These results underline the importance of filament geometry and actin binding site availability in quantitative theories of muscle contraction.

Citing Articles

A novel kinetic model to demonstrate the independent effects of ATP and ADP/Pi concentrations on sarcomere function.

Schmidt A, Grosberg A, Grosberg A PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(8):e1012321.

PMID: 39102392 PMC: 11326600. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012321.


Thermodynamics and Kinetics of a Binary Mechanical System: Mechanisms of Muscle Contraction.

Baker J Langmuir. 2022; 38(51):15905-15916.

PMID: 36520019 PMC: 9798825. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01622.


Heart-on-Chip for Combined Cellular Dynamics Measurements and Computational Modeling Towards Clinical Applications.

Park J, Wu Z, Steiner P, Zhu B, Zhang J Ann Biomed Eng. 2022; 50(2):111-137.

PMID: 35039976 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02902-7.


FiberSim: A flexible open-source model of myofilament-level contraction.

Kosta S, Colli D, Ye Q, Campbell K Biophys J. 2021; 121(2):175-182.

PMID: 34932957 PMC: 8790209. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.12.021.


Force-velocity and tension transient measurements from Drosophila jump muscle reveal the necessity of both weakly-bound cross-bridges and series elasticity in models of muscle contraction.

Jarvis K, Bell K, Loya A, Swank D, Walcott S Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021; 701:108809.

PMID: 33610561 PMC: 7986577. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2021.108809.


References
1.
Gordon A, Homsher E, Regnier M . Regulation of contraction in striated muscle. Physiol Rev. 2000; 80(2):853-924. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.2.853. View

2.
Herzog W, Lee E, Rassier D . Residual force enhancement in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2006; 574(Pt 3):635-42. PMC: 1817744. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.107748. View

3.
Luo Y, Cooke R, Pate E . A model of stress relaxation in cross-bridge systems: effect of a series elastic element. Am J Physiol. 1993; 265(1 Pt 1):C279-88. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.265.1.C279. View

4.
Landesberg A, Sideman S . Coupling calcium binding to troponin C and cross-bridge cycling in skinned cardiac cells. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266(3 Pt 2):H1260-71. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.266.3.H1260. View

5.
Kojima H, Ishijima A, Yanagida T . Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(26):12962-6. PMC: 45560. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12962. View