» Articles » PMID: 16950444

Clinical Outcome and Complications of Temporary Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement

Overview
Journal J Vasc Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2006 Sep 5
PMID 16950444
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the current clinical experience of temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement and its related complications.

Methods: From January 2000 to December 2005, we enrolled 33 patients (8 men and 25 women) who underwent percutaneous insertion of a temporary IVC filter in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Tokyo University Hospital. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was proven in 78.8% of the patients. The indications for filter insertion were contraindication to anticoagulation therapy (9.1%), thrombolytic therapy (12.1%), perioperative prophylactic implantation (84.8%), pregnancy with DVT (3.0%), and prophylactic implantation in the absence of DVT (15.2%). A Neuhaus Protect was used in 13 patients, and an Antheor was used in 20 patients.

Results: The mean +/- SD duration of filter placement was 10.6 +/- 7.0 days. There was no case of pulmonary embolism during filter protection and retraction. Filter thrombosis (capture of thrombus) was observed in four patients (12.1%), who then received additional thrombolytic therapy. Thrombi were dissolved by thrombolysis in three, one of whom had replacement with a permanent filter. The thrombus was not dissolved in one patient and was removed under venotomy at the insertion site. Major filter-related complications occurred in nine patients (27.3%), including filter dislocation in four patients (12.1%), catheter fracture in three (9.1%), and catheter-related infection in one (3.0%). In a patient with giant ovarian cancer, the IVC was nearly occluded with massive thrombus around the filter 2 days after operation, and the vena cava was then ligated under open laparotomy. No patients died during filter protection and retraction.

Conclusions: Temporary IVC filters were effective for the prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism. However, our experience of a high incidence of complications related to temporary filters suggests that this device has limited indications and supports the need for innovative design of temporary filters.

Citing Articles

Large Thrombus Entrapped in a Patent Foramen Ovale during Inferior Vena Cava Filter Protection for Venous Thromboembolism.

Nakamura E, Takagi K, Saku K, Negoto S, Anegawa T, Imai S Case Rep Emerg Med. 2023; 2023:8829652.

PMID: 37691692 PMC: 10484647. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8829652.


Inferior Vena Cava Filters and Complications: A Systematic Review.

Bajda J, Park A, Raj A, Raj R, Gorantla V Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40038.

PMID: 37287823 PMC: 10243179. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40038.


Inferior vena cava filters in pregnancy: Safe or sorry?.

Bistervels I, Buchmuller A, Tardy B Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:1026002.

PMID: 36419489 PMC: 9676232. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1026002.


Over-the-wire deployment techniques of option elite inferior vena cava filter: 3D printing vena cava phantom study.

Park B, Seo A, Lee S, Cha J, Hong J, Lee H Eur J Radiol Open. 2020; 7:100227.

PMID: 32258247 PMC: 7096752. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100227.


Treatment Outcomes of Anticoagulant Therapy and Temporary Inferior Vena Cava Filter Implantation for Pregnancy Complicated by Venous Thrombosis.

Hara N, Miyamoto T, Yamaguchi J, Iwai T, Hijikata S, Watanabe K Ann Vasc Dis. 2018; 11(1):106-111.

PMID: 29682116 PMC: 5882350. DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.17-00100.